Star Wars Battlefront  Review

Star Wars Battlefront Review

Star Wars Battlefront is unquestionably one of the most authentic and well-realised interpretations of George Lucas' original trilogy ever made. It's also a huge missed opportunity. Fans of Star Wars circa 77-83 will get a huge kick out of what DICE has achieved here, and even those not that keen on the antics of Vader and co can still appreciate the level of effort which has been (lovingly) poured into Battlefront. But soon even the most ardent fans will find that, after the spectacle starts to fade, the game's underpinnings don't really support extended play, and a lack of appropriate modes hinders the entire experience.

In a way, the Battlefront beta has worked against the full release. While on its own a superb demonstration of just how well DICE has reworked many elements of the Star Wars universe into video game form, taken now it seems a bit like watching all the many TV spots, trailers, adverts, promos, etc for an upcoming blockbuster, then getting into the theatre and realising you've seen it all. The best mode (Walker Assault) and the second best map (Hoth) have already been extensively showcased. Sadly, almost everything else on offer doesn't hit these heights.

There is still joy in the final product, especially in the early going. Battlefront offers something that you simply cannot get elsewhere: not at this scale, not at this fidelity, not with these production values. The 40-player, objective-based skirmishes encapsulate the absolute essence of Star Wars. I've talked about it at length here, but in short if that original trilogy is about screaming speed, high intensity, against-all-odds heroism, and the push and pull of two oppositional forces, then DICE has it nailed.

Battlefront is full of moments which make you feel like you're in the movies (as is the entire point, but Star Wars games hardly have a stellar reputation in following through here). Picking up a token on the battlefield and spawning as Darth Vader or Luke Skywalker (why you'd choose anyone else, with their puny blasters or Force electricity, is beyond me) and cutting a swathe through enemy forces is simply wonderful, an absolutely pure power fantasy made all the more appealing by watching human players turn and flee in terror. It's particularly pleasing to see Darth Vader enter the battlefield, flashing around like an asthmatic Death, given how de-fanged he's been made since Empire. Hearing the Imperial march cue and seeing him stride into battle produces the same sense of awe as it did when you were a kid, and if for nothing else then this alone makes Battlefront a minor triumph.

So too is there excellence in a great many other interpretations of the form, from the excellent audio design to the feeling of speed when whooshing around on a speeder bike, helped no end by the Swedish developer's technical prowess. Although general image quality on Xbox One isn't stunning – environments are often very jagged, they 'shimmer', and some interiors look like the textures haven't quite popped in – on the whole the team's art direction more than makes up for these issues. Battlefront takes the franchise's iconic motifs and renders them as vast, dense killing fields, beautifully lit (if a little harsh in places) and boasting an impressive amount of geography on screen at once.

The Endor map is the best in the game because it combines Star Wars' legendary production design with DICE's own map-making skill. There's the Ewok (you can't kill them, I tried) treehouses, the blast-door fronted imperial bunkers, the AT-ST's stomping around. But there's also dense foliage to fight through, sniping spots to take up, and stealthy sideways approaches to your targets: it feels like you're fighting through something tangible, rather than across something; less like a camera strapped to a gun and more like a Stormtrooper getting thwacked in the face with a branch. At night, this map is awesome, in the purest possible sense: high above the ground there's red laser fire everywhere, in the distance the terrifying 'whoomp' of a thermal imploder, huge explosions, troops fighting and dying, and perhaps the flash of a green lightsaber brightening a path below. John Williams' score would be playing in your head, if it wasn't playing from your sound system already.

Star Wars: Battlefront screenshot

Give it a few hours, however, and the allure of this spectacle begins to fade. Soon, you're left to reckon with the fact that while Battlefront excels in making real those dreams of fighting Darth Vader on Hoth, it doesn't nail the rather more prosaic elements of first person shooters.

Like Battlefield (and every other shooter) Battlefront has a rank-and-unlock system. Points you score in games are converted into credits, and you can use these to buy more gear or adjust the way you look. Certain weapons and 'cards' (cooldown-governed special abilities like jetpacks and grenades, which are organised into 'hands' and taken into battle) are locked to higher levels, so – as ever – you're encouraged to climb the ladder, playing in game after game to get hold of new and supposedly better equipment.

There are plenty of weapons to unlock, but sadly they rarely satisfy, lacking (ironically) in force, feeling too weedy and seeming to take too long to hit their target. These firearms are energy-based, and there are different types to choose from – single-shot, marksman rifles, the blasters you all know and love from the movies – but by and large they lack kick, with some having the worst time-to-kill since Matthew McConaughey.

The counter-argument is that the better weapons are unlocked later down the line, and while this may be true, the simple fact is you've still got to use the other guns to unlock better ones, and with shooting being so average you may feel exhausted by the time you get them. In fact, fatigue is Battlefront's main problem. Its two best modes, Walker Assault and the reverse-tug-of-war alike Supremacy, where you have to push the other team back, capturing their nodes as you do so, only have four maps each. And while some of these are absolute belters, there's no denying that when Sorosuub Centroplex comes round in rotation, again, it starts to dawn that there's not all that much to Battlefront.

There are plenty of gametypes, but beyond the two previously mentioned – as well as the enjoyable if limited Fighter Squadron (dogfights over a planet's surface) and Drop Zone (Headquarters, basically) – the rest only seem to reinforce Battlefront's negative aspects. Blast (team deathmatch) and Droid Run (a domination-alike) suffer for the reasons listed above, while Hero Hunt (kill the character to become the character) may as well be called Kill Stealing: the Game. The absolute nadir is Heroes vs Villains, where you and your team pick which hero character to be and wade into battle against your opposite numbers, like if the Emperor and Darth Vader decided to kick off in a space Wetherspoons. It's weak, and mitigates the primary power of the characters: that you can only rarely play as them.

These modes simply don't fit this experience, run 'n' gun fests which the combat wasn't built for. To make these gametypes work, Battlefront needed an overarching campaign, something to add weight to the rather transient nature of your matches. It also needed better aerial combat: in general the maps are too small for it to really work, with players zooming from one end of the map before making a hard turn so they don't get counted out. 'Missions' mode hints at what could have been, with speeder bike chases and dogfights down Beggar's Canyon, and given how enjoyable some of these missions are, the people clamouring for a single-player campaign may find themselves even more disappointed.

Star Wars Battlefront, then, is one of the best experiences of the year, if only for a short while. Completionists may stay with it to unlock figures for the in-game diorama which shows how many challenges you've completed, but others will find their interest has waned long before that. Too limited in its maps and modes to keep people hooked, it will nevertheless provide enough fun to jump onto once in a while, hear that famous score and maybe take down an AT-AT. Those who wanted a Battlefront III, however, will have to wait a little while longer.

Version tested: Xbox One. Played on live public servers

7 / 10

  • Excellent attention to detail
  • Some great modes
  • Shooting often feels too weak
  • Most other game modes have little to offer

Click above for enlarged Star Wars: Battlefront (2015) Screenshots


To add your comment, please login or register

User Comments

Kojimaybe@ CPTAwes0me23

Sounds good for what I needed. Thanks.
Posted 10:11 on 16 November 2015
CPTAwes0me23's Avatar

CPTAwes0me23@ Kojimaybe

There's 4 survival missions with 3 levels of difficulty and 5 training missions that can be done in co op. There's a Battle mode with 8 maps which is split screen but vs not co-op. It seems like its kill confirmed from COD.
Posted 09:03 on 16 November 2015


I was dead excited for the game, I was a massive fan of the originals on Xbox and what not. That beta though killed it, I cancelled my pre order (the first game I pre ordered since Aliens: Colonial Marines) and thought I'd wait and see some more on it. It seemed exactly the same in the Beta... "wow this is Star Wars... okay I'm bored now".
Posted 10:35 on 15 November 2015


Are there any other modes with local co-op apart from Survival?
Posted 08:52 on 15 November 2015
schroederrock's Avatar


I put about 3 hours into this game during the beta and another 4+ hours after the EA Access members on XB1 were able to start playing it. I intend to fill out the 10 hour trial before making my decision on purchasing it. However, the beta worried me that this game lacked depth, and the final product only alleviated a small portion of that concern. That means I still don't feel like they did this right. The scale found in Battlefield games is somewhat there, but the whole package feels too simplified. I have enough fun to enjoy my time in-game, but I don't feel hooked into anything. The Star Wars fanfare will only carry the game so far. The soundtrack and iconic characters are a treat, and seeing a massive AT-AT going through a forest on Endor is so cool. But there's no campaign to play through, suspect vehicle controls, some spawn protection issues (I got spawn killed 3x in a row because DICE didn't vary/protect the spawns well-enough from an overwhelming defending/attacking force. I think the 7 might be an appropriate rating. Some will like the game enough to keep playing, but there's not even that many maps to play on. Honestly, I wanted a Star Wars BattleFIELD experience more than another Battlefront experience. Battlefield works so well as a large-scale multiplayer game.

It also doesn't make sense that this game keeps the low 720p resolution with only 20v20. There are some enemy vehicles to account for, but those same conditions existed in Battlefield as well two years ago. There seems to be a little better lighting and smoothing effects, but they're still pretty light compared to what you'd find on a PC. I guess there's not enough of a "massive" feel to make me think I'm really engaged in an all-out war between the Rebel Alliance and the Empire. My buddy is a die-hard Star Wars fan and picked up the EA Access package to play it early for 10 hrs before he makes his buying decision. Even he is a bit skeptical of the game being fun long-term. Shoot, I can't even hop on those cool speeders on Endor during any of the 5 gametypes I played. That was one of the really cool parts of the first full-length trailer reveal that made me think Battlefront was going to be special.

My advice: If you have an XB1, spend $5 for an EA Access membership (good for 1 month) and see the entire game without limits (minus the 10 hour trial period you get) before buying the game. It's the best way to experience this title without forking over a full $60, plus you get 10% off if you buy it digitally. So if you love it, you'll save $6 when you go to purchase it (saving you $1 in the end if you don't already have an active EA Access subscription).
Posted 02:52 on 15 November 2015


Will be interesting to see how their long game plays out. Clearly needs a bit of work and additional maps, modes and fixes to modes.

I'd be interested to find out about it in development. I'm not that sure there was a great deal here that Dice wouldn't be able to knock together very quickly.
Posted 08:59 on 14 November 2015

Game Stats

Star Wars: Battlefront (2015)
Out of 10
Star Wars: Battlefront (2015)
  • Excellent attention to detail
  • Some great modes
  • Shooting often feels too weak
  • Most other game modes have little to offer
Agree? Disagree? Get Involved!
Release Date: 20/11/2015
Platforms: Xbox One , PS4 , PC
Developer: D.I.C.E
Publisher: EA
Genre: First Person Shooter
Rating: TBC
Site Rank: 387 68
View Full Site