Medal of Honor: Warfighter Review

Medal of Honor: Warfighter screenshot
Medal of Honor: Warfighter screenshot

For a game that's done its utmost to claim the word 'authentic' as part of its hype campaign, Medal of Hono(u)r: Warfighter doesn't feel anything at all like a genuine portrayal of war. Admittedly I've never been a soldier, but it's going to take more than the term 'inspired by actual events' at the start of the level to convince me that a team of US operatives once snuck into the Philippines and killed about three hundred people before escaping a flooded city on a whizzy speedboat while an attack chopper reduced everything to rubble.

But, hey, maybe I'm just wrong. Maybe this kind of stuff happens all the time, and I'm just too busy eating biscuits and reading X-Factor news to notice. Maybe Medal of Honor: Warfighter is actually a harrowing and authentic portrayal of armed conflict, one complete with just the right amount of regenerating health and about a zillion breach-and-clear sequences. Here's a fun fact: Warfighter turns its breaching bits into a kind of weird mini-game where you have to score headshots during the slow-mo bit to unlock additional entrance options, such as opening the door with a crowbar, opening the door with a tomahawk or, if you're feeling particularly spicy, opening the door with an explosive charge.

Viewed from the lens that it wants to be seen, the nonsense becomes overpowering. Inspired by actual events, says the game over and over again, as your special forces colleagues dish out infinite caches of ammunition from their magical bottomless pockets whenever you need a resupply. Wide-eyed terrorists run about aimlessly while their AI subroutines make them take turns to stand in the exact same place behind the exact same crate, never blinking as their models shrug off three or four bullets to the chest. Occasional spectacle isn't nearly spectacular enough to cover up that this brief 13-level campaign is a tawdry pop-up theatre of the worst kind.

This is Warfighter: You enter a room. A nasty man jumps up from the right - surprise! - then a nasty man pops up from the left - gotcha! After you kill them both a nastier man storms in, and after he's been offed a fourth (the nastiest, presumably) runs in behind him. After a few seconds pause another kicks in the door to your left, which is then the route you must take. Repeat.

But arguing about Warfighter's supposed authenticity feels like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic, because you could equip the lads from Team Force Mako (which, as far as I can tell, is not a Final Fantasy VII reference) with a gun that fires sharks which breathe fire and it wouldn't do much to save this brief and clearly rushed video game. Your chase of elusive terrorist leader The Cleric takes you across a disjointed, incoherent adventure that has you shooting people in Yemen, Pakistan, Sarajevo and Dubai across a flickering period of time. Between the limp shooting you get intermittent CGI cutscenes (which feature, coincidentally, the most hideous CGI child a computer has ever produced) of your characters' honest American families worrying about the safety of their partners on these dangerous away missions.

The game's mix of clumsy bugs, dire AI and frustrating scripting errors (even after the day one patch) grates even more as Danger Close basks in its explosive reverence of these fighters of war. We are not experiencing the emotional range of a soldier, because these soldiers are nameless puppets with no human dialogue that skitter around and often run into walls. How, outside of cheesy soap-opera cutscenes, are we supposed to actually care for Stump, Voodoo, Mother and Preacher? Danger Close has no idea what it's saying or, crucially, what it even wants to say, and its attempt at reverence comes from pinching off with tried-and-tested Call of Duty driving mechanics and adding a couple of driving levels.

Medal of Honor: Warfighter screenshot

So, yes, for all the baulk and posturing of authenticity my impression of Warfighter is that it's little more than another bungled attempt to emulate Call of Duty with an additional layer of jingoistic bravado layered on top for good measure.

Multiplayer offers Medal of Honor: Warfighter little redemption. Framed around familiar objective and deathmatch modes, Warfighter attempts to craft its own identity by bringing a sense of global patriotism to online battlefields. Your choice of nation reflects your starting class, with additional classes (and nations) unlocked over time. The end result is an awkward meshing of Battlefield's class system with a desire to have you playing for your country. The result is that I'm often playing as Germany simply because I like being a heavy gunner, rather than any deep-seated love for Angela Merkel.

The other back-of-the-box selling point is an emphasis on teamwork, the game matching players up with a buddy they can see on the map at all times, alongside the ability to resupply your chum and use them a mobile spawn point. But, really, the end result is just splitting Battlefield's four man squads in half.

'There's no craft here, no passion, and Warfighter's wonky online modes will likely become a ghost town long before Call of Duty: Black Ops II is even released.'

The mechanical implementation of the multiplayer is also sorely lacking, complete with a horrible menu that makes levelling up feel like a chore rather than a celebration. The progression system is also far too conservative, locking away all the best toys behind a level most players will never be prepared to reach. Simply decorating your virtual soldier feels like a laborious task.

But the real killer is that Warfighter's maps are just too boring to take you away from other, better shooters. Each small, cookie-cutter environment feels like it's been lifted wholesale from a beginner's book of multiplayer map design, and these staid environments completely robs the occasionally tense gunplay of its potential. There's no craft here, no passion, and Warfighter's wonky online modes will likely become a ghost town long before Call of Duty: Black Ops II is even released.

I'd like to see Danger Close take a real, genuine crack at the thoughtful war shooter they clearly want to make, because its repeated attempts at a weak Call of Duty knock-off isn't going to win over hearts and minds. Medal of Honor: Warfighter never stood a chance, and its deep schism between intended tone and actual design feels even more comically tragic now than it did with the original reboot two years ago. This is a bland, buggy and often boring title, one that belies the intentions of its developers and leaves the much-maligned modern shooter looking worse as a result.

Version Tested: PlayStation 3

5 / 10

  • Some occasionally nice spectacles
  • Multiplayer isn't good
  • Riddled with bugs
  • Tone doesn't fit

Click above for enlarged Medal of Honor: Warfighter Screenshots

To add your comment, please login or register

User Comments

Wido's Avatar


Well so far on how much I have played, I disagree with pretty much all the reviews out there. Shouldn't knock it until you try it comes to mind, but I'm enjoying it thus far.
Posted 13:10 on 29 October 2012
rbevanx's Avatar

rbevanx@ Joey_Bananas

They had 4 years to make this one???

Hang them! :P

I'm playing Spec Ops now and for a fiver on PC it's a steal.
Posted 12:00 on 26 October 2012
Joey_Bananas's Avatar


Could this signal the end for Danger Close?

The only game they've developed with relative success in terms of sales AND critic reviews was Boom Blox and that was in 2008 on the Wii. After that they've only achieved moderate success with their titles. If you look at their track record, they've pumped out a lot of things in the past 4 years and only 1-2 have been reviewed with positive notes. 4 years is a long time in game development, and under performing developers owned by EA don't seem to last very long after a few duds.

What I'm saying is that Danger Close is very hit and miss, where they can get many sales out of mediocre titles, which damage their reputation, or get good reviews out of smaller titles but not generate much in terms of revenue - when, let's face it - which their parent company EA is all about.

Maybe "Danger Close" is an apt name for this developer. We all know what happens to developers under these large corporations that receive bad critic reviews and don't sell enough copies of their games.

As for Warfighter - I could see it coming since it was revealed. Medal of Honor was average at best, and the MP wasn't anything special and plagued with problems in the first few weeks. By the time they got to fixing things, people were already leaving to play Black Ops. It's going to be exactly the same here with Black Ops 2 coming out next month, and Battlefield 3 out there too.

There's really no need for another mediocre, corridor shooter in todays modern conflict environment. You either make new roads to take the genre down (like Spec Ops: The Line), or really expand on what's there and make it better without doing anything ground-breaking. Danger Close did neither - and I hope MOHWF flops because hopefully it'll make them realise if they aren't going to put the effort in to make it good, we as the consumer won't put the effort in to buy it.
Posted 11:55 on 26 October 2012

pblive@ altaranga

Pussy Galore?
Posted 21:56 on 25 October 2012
altaranga's Avatar

altaranga@ pblive

I always assumed they meant Honor Blackman.
Posted 21:54 on 25 October 2012


I knew it was going to be bad when they still spelt Honour wrong ;)
Posted 21:41 on 25 October 2012
altaranga's Avatar


But is it any good?
Posted 21:17 on 25 October 2012
rbevanx's Avatar

rbevanx@ MJTH

The people committed to the battlefield series will buy this just for the Battlefield 4 Beta.

That did make me chuckle but it's soooooo true lol, a beta to a game being more important than the game itself to people.

You just have to laugh sometimes, reminds me of WB putting certain trailers into rubbish films to make the poor ones sell more.
Posted 19:29 on 25 October 2012
Hooded's Avatar


You could see how EA lost confidence in this game about 4-5 months ago. EA would be stupid to let Danger Close do another MOH game. Stick to Battlefield, it doesn't make sense trying to battle Call of Duty year on year with two separate franchises.
Posted 19:26 on 25 October 2012
MJTH's Avatar

MJTH@ rbevanx

Depressingly now that you mention it, this probably will still sell well. The people committed to the battlefield series will buy this just for the Battlefield 4 Beta.
Posted 19:22 on 25 October 2012
rbevanx's Avatar

rbevanx@ MJTH

They will if it makes money but it depends if the people who bought Battlefield 3 and are still commited to Battlefield 3 with it's DLC etc, are intrested at all in getting this new MOH and if that market aspect will effect if it is a hit or not.
Posted 19:10 on 25 October 2012
MJTH's Avatar


The final nail in what is the medal of honour reboot franchise. I doubt EA will making a sequel any time soon especially not in 2014 to make this annual franchise...
Posted 19:06 on 25 October 2012
rbevanx's Avatar


This has not surprised me one bit and it will still make money.
Posted 19:00 on 25 October 2012
Clockpunk's Avatar


Time for the franchise to take a break for a few years...? I suspect so.
Posted 18:47 on 25 October 2012
FantasyMeister's Avatar


I'd genuinely like to know how the game got to this stage. Surely someone must've known when it went gold that so many things were just plain wrong, and yet it got shipped anyway. Is it really a case of they think they'll make a profit anyway so it's ok? And if that turns out to be true, which is more deserving of my resultant boycott, developer or publisher?
Posted 18:45 on 25 October 2012

Game Stats

Medal of Honor: Warfighter
Out of 10
Medal of Honor: Warfighter
  • Some occasionally nice spectacles
  • Multiplayer isn't good
  • Riddled with bugs
  • Tone doesn't fit
Agree? Disagree? Get Involved!
Release Date: 26/10/2012
Platforms: PS3 , Xbox 360 , PC
Developer: Danger Close
Publisher: EA
Genre: First Person Shooter
Rating: PEGI 16+
Site Rank: 3,398 2
View Full Site