Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 Review

Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 screenshot
Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 screenshot

While Modern Warfare 3 clearly had a big sweetheart crush on Michael Bay, Treyarch's Black Ops II clearly wants nothing more than to pucker up and make out with Paul Verhoeven in a filthy nightclub. Much of this game, which feels like Treyarch doing its best to shrug off the modern shooter template it helped create, feels like a diligent check-list of eighties action movie tropes, gratuitous military porn and a mawkish 9/11 allegory. There's even an obligatory action scene in a nightclub, though I'm fairly sure Treyarch will be proved wrong in its prediction that the dubstep fad will be able to ride it out until 2025.

The lumps of sci-fi gadgetry served up by this near-future setting are predominantly toys for multiplayer, of course, and it's surprising to see just how much these gimmicky gizmos revitalise the rhythms of play without changing Call of Duty's familiar online experience. Having the options to, say, fling electrical shock charges on the ground, see through walls (in my day that was called hacking) or call down a spinning robot drone really helps to add a new sheen to Call of Duty's annual shopping catalogue of guns and gear in a game that was becoming little too stymied and regimental in its regular offerings.

There's no chance of mistaking this new sheen for any noticeable innovation, however, which is something I said last year and will probably be repeated again in 2013. Call of Duty is now as familiar a part of November as Guy Fawkes Night or Thanksgiving, and Black Ops II feels like it's singing to the series' all-too recognisable tune.

Treyarch makes no real effort to change the emphasis on tight infantry skirmishes, and instead refocuses its experience to play up to its futuristic gimmicks and further emphasise Call of Duty's twitch-based heritage. This isn't really a big surprise when you remember how Call of Duty is making an obvious stab for the hardcore eSports market this year, incorporating a League Play option which unlocks all weaponry by default, removes the Care Package streak and even allows live streaming of games to YouTube. League Play offers six divisions which reset once a month, and players and clans can go up as well as down after an opening string of five matches determine initial placement.

Much of Black Ops II revolves around Treyarch's 10-point loadout scheme, which allows players to deck their custom classes out with more variety than previous titles. Every item - weapons, attachments, grenades and perks - is given a singular point value, and wildcard options (which cost a point of their own) are included so players can have, say, a fourth perk. Don't fancy a tactical grenade or secondary weapon? You can go for a third attachment or second grenade instead.

Black Ops II's breadcrumb trail of unlocks, once the series' signature piece but now relegated to part of the modern shooter framework, is slightly easier to digest than in Modern Warfare 3. Perks no longer affect weaponry; old favourites like Stopping Power, which used to provide a universal damage boost, have now been superseded by specific attachments, unlocked by levelling up the gun in question. It makes more sense that you boost your accuracy by clipping on a laser sight (or, if you want to be fancy, the new millimetre scanner and target finder) rather than activating a weapon-specific perk, but essentially this is more rearrangement than refinement. Still, all things considered, I think Black Ops II has better Feng Shui.

Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 screenshot

Refinement is clearly Treyarch's goal, so it's no surprise to see the complicated business of Modern Warfare 3's trio of Strike Packages trimmed into a simpler Scorestreaks system. Here Black Ops II doles out points when players accomplish kills and other assorted in-game tasks, such as capturing points in Domination or picking up tags in Kill Confirmed, and dishes out your usual streak rewards, with Black Ops' RC-XD and attack dogs making their reappearance alongside quadrotors and whizzy futuristic attack drones. Much of what you can accomplish in the game is rewarded with points; there's even a steady numerical trickle when you've got an active UAV hovering around. For the first time in Call of Duty, actually defending the objective can rack up a serious amount of points.

'And as much as I enjoyed the original Black Ops, it was a game where I decked out the MP5K and never felt the need to use another weapon ever again.'

But, as is it with any game played regularly by an active community, some of the smallest changes will have the biggest impact. Treyarch claims it has developed an intelligent spawning system that will actively adapt and develop over time, for instance - which, as anyone who's played on Modern Warfare 3's Hardhat map will tell you, could have a significant effect on the play-by-play rhythm of the game. The developer has also softened its previously hostile stance on snipers and included quickscoping, modifying player hitboxes to make such feats a real skillshot. In general, Black Ops II's weapons have very little recoil compared to the rest of the genre, and a shotgun with a long barrel and stock is an ADS beast. Only time will tell how Black Ops II's players will respond to these changes, but those that have become frustrated with the series' proliferation of shotguns will probably be ready to call it a day.

And as much as I enjoyed the original Black Ops, it was a game where I decked out the MP5K and never felt the need to use another weapon ever again. Black Ops II is still very much a game where SMG's excel - I'm a fan of the Vector K10, personally - but early impressions suggest far more scope for versatility and customisation. I do like the punchy feel and the meaty, loud and easily detectable sounds of all the weaponry, and mixed with Black Ops II's slightly slower movement speed this makes good positioning vital.

It's a shame after last year's excellent Kill Confirmed that new modes Multi-Team Deathmatch and Hardpoint don't do much to detract from TDM, Domination and Search & Destroy. To many, however, the single most important part of Black Ops II will be its 14 new maps. These are traditional Treyarch designs, most bordering on mid-to-large sizes, and have a slightly more regimented structure compared to Modern Warfare 3's figure-of-eight murdergasms. I think a few of these offerings (such as Cargo and Raid) will even be remembered as fondly as Grid and Summit down the line.

As always there are more than a few areas that prompt feelings of deja vu: bits of Turbine recall Modern Warfare 2's Afghan so heavily that I was half-expecting to be immediately rushed by akimbo 1887's, and Hijacked comes across as an opulent version of Call of Duty 4's Wetwork. As a whole, though, Black Ops II revels in choke points, killzones and general carnage, and provides a frenetic counterpoint from the epic sprawl of Battlefield 3 or the tactical precision of Halo 4.

Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 screenshot

There's also a single-player campaign, of course. And, well, that doesn't fare nearly as well. That the multiplayer often feels so punchy and compelling makes the single-player feel even more tired by comparison, as Treyarch tries to juggle its concurrent 1980s and 2025 storylines with an ensemble cast so bloated I've already forgotten most of it. One of the guys is voiced by the Candyman - that's about all I can tell you.

As Woods, Mason and Mason Jr, you high-tail around an 11-level campaign taking in the sights of China, Central America, Asia and the Caribbean in a bid to both further the convoluted-but-enjoyable cheese of the original Black Ops, alongside a futuristic plot about a slighted Central American terrorist enacting a plot to destroy the G20 countries. Much of it feels like six hours of stitched-together waffle and padding, and the series' signature trait of generating spectacle doesn't work when everything feels so unspectacular. For the first time in a Call of Duty game, I was bored by what was going on around me.

Perhaps to compensate, at times it really tries to be offensive. There are at least two incredibly gratuitous shots of people being burned alive in the opening fifteen minutes, and the campaign merrily skips towards Cuban child soldiers and a shipping container full of decomposing bodies before the end of your first hour. Such moments are an awkward, jarring contrast between the endearing silliness of the campaign's 80s-inspired best bits, which variously find you firing rockets at helicopters from a horse and punching people with an electric glove that causes them to vomit to death. When Black Ops II is hamming up its 80s inspirations it's actually a fairly entertaining display of action movie fluff, but such amusement is thoroughly quashed when Treyarch attempts to layer its exploitative modern gratuities on top. It's a campaign that can never decide whether it wants to be kitsch or harrowing, so in the end it accomplishes neither. And one particular level where you're running around as a madman with a machete is really just incomprehensible bollocks.

'Whereas the traditional elements of a Call of Duty campaign weave an elaborate display of smoke and mirrors to guide you down its linear corridors, the five Strike Force missions shine a whopping great spotlight on the engine's greatest weaknesses.'

Every now and then you'll also be chucked into a Strike Force mission, which attempts to weave a layer of real-time strategy on top of the familiar shooting by allowing you to zoom out and reposition a group of squads as you attempt to attack or defend an objective. It's a nice idea, but the sad reality of these half-baked missions is that they feel like they were added in solely to appease whoever writes the game's box blurb.

Whereas the traditional elements of a Call of Duty campaign weave an elaborate display of smoke and mirrors to guide you down its linear corridors, the five Strike Force missions shine a whopping great spotlight on the engine's greatest weaknesses. These hollow constructions do not allow for thoughtful organic play, and any high-concept idea of battlefield strategy collapses with AI that is routinely incapable of doing anything productive. That the game gives you limited attempts at accomplishing these fussy, fiddly missions is even more counter-productive, ensuring that you're never truly able to try out any new ideas or properly experiment with these mechanics. Not that you'd ever want to.

With the campaign as it is, the idea that you'd want to go back and replay it multiple times is laughable. In the end you're just chasing another villain in a desperate bid to quash a terrorist atrocity, but now you've got customisable loadouts (heavily restricted by completion and challenges) and the option to kill or save certain characters that marginally affects the ending cinematic.

You're never more than an actor in Treyarch's neoconservative wet dream of a campaign, its muddled narrative attempting - but failing - to address contemporary issues of class and wealth. In the end, however, Black Ops II ends up as staunch defender of capitalism, military might and free trade. As a narrative it has absolutely no idea what it wants to accomplish.

Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 screenshot

Rounding off the experience is Zombies, the cheap and cheerful bonus mode that has you exploring B-movie settings while fending off increasingly difficult waves of zombies. Treyarch has split its one campaign, Green Run, into a series of five maps. These can all be linked together by the TranZit mode which gives you robot zombie bus driver, which plays up to the sense of exploration and discovery that was conjured so successfully by Black Ops' later Zombies maps. Each one of these areas - bus stop, diner, farm, power plant, and city - can be played individually in Survival mode, or in a 4v4 survival mode called Grief, which quickly falls flat. There's a lot on offer with Green Run, but it would have been nice to have had a second campaign included before the inevitable barrage of DLC begins.

'For the first time since Modern Warfare 2 I am plotting out loadouts and map strategies on the train to work.'

How, then, do you rate a game like Call of Duty: Black Ops II? The weak campaign is a massive disappointment, and the bizarre and disjointed execution of its signature set-piece moments are failed even further by the woeful Strike Force missions and wonky, wishy-washy attempts at player interactivity. It is, to put it simply, bad. Yet the multiplayer side of the game has successfully managed to rekindle my love for Call of Duty's close-range playgrounds, and Treyarch's decision to mix an excellent selection of maps with a new bag of futuristic toys reinvigorates an experience that I was starting to tire of. For the first time since Modern Warfare 2 I am plotting out loadouts and map strategies on the train to work.

A divisive game, then, and a thorny scoring situation I've not found myself in since last year's Battlefield 3. In the end, though, I prioritise the giddy highs of Black Ops II's exhilarating multiplayer over the disappointment of its poor and brief campaign. Be very careful if you don't.

Version Tested: Xbox 360

This review was written after spending 16 hours with the game, with six hours spent playing the campaign and the rest in multiplayer over a local network. The game was played at a two-day review event hosted by Activision in early November, and also with retail Xbox 360 code obtained independently by

8 / 10

  • A good selection of varied maps
  • Multiplayer is a blast
  • Campaign disappoints
  • Strike Force is a massive failure

Click above for enlarged Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 Screenshots


To add your comment, please login or register

User Comments

altaranga's Avatar


I turned a bit of a corner with this game last night. After creating my first custom class with an SMG I started getting K/D ratios >1, calling in killstreak rewards and top scoring for my team. All was going so well until the last game, when our whole team got completely owned on some level with a yacht. We literally couldn't get out of one end of the boat. I think for that round my K/D must have been about 0.1.

I'm starting to enjoy this game a bit more now; I forgot how much custom classes adds to the game and of course learning the maps also greatly helps. I still don't know all of the game types, though, and tend to stick to Team Deathmatch and Domination.
Posted 09:05 on 16 November 2012
Bloodstorm's Avatar


No one get it?

It's the vile......

Oliver North
Posted 14:38 on 15 November 2012
altaranga's Avatar

altaranga@ oztiks

I think Martin's point is something along the lines of it being unnecessary. There are plenty of ways of showing the MO of an antagonist without some sort of machete-fest. I also think Martin is smart enough to work out a video game storyline by now.

Back to why I came to this thread... if anyone fancies a game or two online, either multiplayer or zombies, then look me up. I'm playing on 360, gamertag AltaRanga. I'll be on most evenings as early as possible

Had a few games last night with squidmania and MrHewbo. I think I'm getting better, but I still suck atm. Sorry I had to duck out so quickly. Family stuff.
Posted 08:21 on 15 November 2012
oztiks's Avatar


When you are running around as the madman with the machete you are The Main Villain (Terrorist), and it does a good job of helping to explain why he became such a madman and his hatred for America. Maybe you should repay the Campaign again and then reevaluate it once you understand the storyline.
Posted 04:14 on 15 November 2012
altaranga's Avatar

altaranga@ squidman

I've owned all of the CoDs since MW came out. I only started playing BF when I started to tire of the endless pursuit of 'prestiging'. Since then I have been hooked on BF, and probably would be still if it weren't for the server issues I've experienced.

I went into this with my eyes very much wide open. I was just looking for something to fill my time between now and... well... we'll see. I know it'll take a bit of getting used to and some adjustment on my part. I was just a little surprised at how much of a step backwards it felt.

Btw, I've never been a fan of Nuke Town either. Perhaps trying to rekindle things by jumping into a multiplayer game on this particular map wasn't the best start.
Posted 09:31 on 14 November 2012
Bloodstorm's Avatar


No one seems to know that Treyarch got a known war criminal for it's advertising....

Can you name who?
Posted 03:10 on 14 November 2012
squidman's Avatar

squidman@ altaranga

Nuketown's always been a contentious map, but its popularity is staggering - few maps could be used as genuine pre-order incentives. I've never been a big fan.

I think it's a different beast to Battlefield, really. Go into one expecting the other and you'll end up sorely disappointed. I think Blops II does that close-up infantry shootyshooty better than its rivals, but it definitely feels a bit vintage compared to some of its more modern contemporaries.

Heck, I think its TDM is better than BF3's TDM at any rate. And I even quite like the Close Quarters map.

Oh yea, and the campaign is a bit wank.
Posted 22:41 on 13 November 2012
altaranga's Avatar


Ok, I'm playing the single player just so I can get used to the controls again (after solely playing EA shooters for the past 18 months). So far it feels like a giant leap back in time. The campaign is terrible.

I tell you what, too. Going from BF3's Armored Kill maps to Nuke Town is a real shock. Makes me appreciate the effort DICE put into their maps.

First impressions... I can't wait for Battlefield 4. I'll give it time though. I haven't got much choice.
Posted 22:15 on 13 November 2012
altaranga's Avatar


Great read, Gaston.

"Black Ops II has better Feng Shui" made me smirk.

"you're running around as a madman with a machete is really just incomprehensible bollocks" made me snort a laugh bogey.

This game was on my birthday list and should have arrived though my front door by now. The result of this review was never going to persuade nor dissuade me from getting it, but it at least seems to confirm my choice of buying BlOps 2 over MoH 2.

I'll hopefully catch you online sometime.

PS. I actually like the addition of V's post script after each review detailing when you played it, for how long and by what means. This extra level of transparency is most welcome.
Posted 12:32 on 13 November 2012
mrsid's Avatar


Excellent and balanced review! I'm an hour in on the PC version (released a bit earlier in Sydney) and must say I'm actually enjoying the reasonably coherent story and lack of screaming sessions that formed the interrogation cut scenes in the original. I am weary of it becoming a bit same-same and yes when a roller coaster ride such as this starts getting all serious on you, like Sly Stallone in Rambo 2 + 3 (Rambo 1 was untouchable), you begin to raise your eyebrows a little and wonder if this is the future of FPS games and are they really trying to educate you on the horrors of it all---whilst banking untold millions?
Posted 11:13 on 13 November 2012
walterkovacs's Avatar


Excellent review.
Posted 10:30 on 13 November 2012
TheHindude's Avatar


Fantastic review. I'd quite like to play the game but i'm just not prepared to pay the £40+ price tag... I just don't see the value in it and i'm not overly enamoured with the franchise nowadays.

One for the christmas list
Posted 09:50 on 13 November 2012


I'm not sure about whether I 'need' this game or not, but the excellent review does a lot to make me think I may give this one a miss unless I make use of GAMEs trade-in deal.

Interesting to note that it was reviewed based on a bought copy and not Activision review code.
Posted 09:01 on 13 November 2012
Wido's Avatar


Good read Martin The overall reception for this is expected and the review scores won't make a dent in its sale figs. The multiplayer is where its at for me! I'll play the story and more than likely like it and then get bored to buggery.

Does Black Ops 2 suffer with the endless enemy AI until you reach the end of the corridor, checkpoint Martin?
Posted 08:21 on 13 November 2012

Game Stats

Call of Duty: Black Ops 2
Out of 10
Call of Duty: Black Ops 2
  • A good selection of varied maps
  • Multiplayer is a blast
  • Campaign disappoints
  • Strike Force is a massive failure
Agree? Disagree? Get Involved!
Release Date: 13/11/2012
Platforms: Xbox 360 , PS3 , PC , Wii U
Developer: Treyarch
Publisher: Activision
Genre: First Person Shooter
Rating: PEGI 18+
Site Rank: 489 48
View Full Site