Splinter Cell: Conviction News

For:Xbox 360  Also On: PC Release Date: 16 April 2010

Insists 'no-one's working on a PS3 version' of Conviction.

Splinter Cell: Conviction screenshot

As console war arguments fuelled by platform exclusives rage across the internet, we rarely stop to think about the creators themselves, or the benefits platform exclusivity bring to game development.

Max Beland, creative director of upcoming Xbox 360 and PC exclusive stealth action game Splinter Cell: Conviction, however, has revealed to VideoGamer.com why the Ubisoft Montreal development team loves platform exclusivity.

"On a development side it's easier to only focus on one platform," he said.

"It's not like it's impossible, right, to develop on both platforms. It's easy. You add more programmers and that's it. But for us it allows us to focus on the 360. There are also some decisions we take that mean we don't need to take a different decision for the other platform, like the controls.

"There's one setup of controls that we need to tweak and balance. The sticks on PS3 are not the same. Often shooting you don't put on the lower trigger on the PS3 - you put it above because the triggers on the 360 are concave, so your finger rests well on them, versus on PS3, the triggers are convex, so you slip. It's the same thing for cover. We've got a holding trigger for cover, but then that on PS3, it's not comfortable, because you end up getting in cover, then your finger slips, so we have to put it on the buttons. The controls are always a big challenge. That's one less headache."

According to Beland, every console has what are called TCRs (Technical Certification Requirements), which govern a game's reaction to certain conditions.

"What happens when I'm playing a game, and I unplug my controller and plug a new one in right away? The game needs to pause. You can't crash. What happens if while I'm saving I remove my hard disk and put a memory card in, and unplug the network cable at the same time? Those are all very platform specific, and all unique for a platform that you need to code and debug. That's a lot of time.

"So, by only shipping on one platform, we only have the Microsoft requirements to support. We don't have the PS3 requirements to support. And also the whole multiplayer part, like supporting the friends and all of that, obviously it's a lot simpler to only support them on one platform."

Beland also put to bed any lingering rumours that Conviction is what's called a "timed exclusive", stating categorically that the game will never come to the PS3.

"There's no PS3 version," he insisted. "No-one's working on a PS3 version. We're an exclusive Xbox 360 and PC title. That's it."

When asked why 360 exclusivity was right for Conviction, Beland replied: "That deal was decided while I was on [Rainbow Six] Vegas. I've been on Conviction for two years - two years and a month now. So I don't know... this is Yves Guillemot and the business people that did a deal with Microsoft at the time.

"I think it's cool because the first Splinter Cell game was an Xbox exclusive. We've got a great relationship with Microsoft. They often come to the Montreal studio and they're helping us with optimising the code. They send engineers and stuff. We've got a really good relationship with them. From my perspective, we're Xbox exclusive, so, okay, sure, no problem. We're working with them and making sure the game is as good as possible and optimised on that platform."

With the game due out on April 16, we don't have long to find out for ourselves.

For all the latest news, previews, and trailers, head over to our Splinter Cell: Conviction game page.

New stuff to check out

Comments

To add your comment, please login or register

Highest Rated Comment

MTMind2's Avatar

MTMind2@ fps_d0minat0r

More space doesn't equal better game any more than a bigger plate equals a better meal or a longer movie equals a better movie. :-)

That said, the finger slipping argument is a little weak, but it is an example of the myriad of details which need to be considered for each format supported, and therefore the less formats supported for a game, the easier it is for the developer.
Posted 15:33 on 02 March 2010

User Comments

thompo555's Avatar

thompo555

if they are that worried then they should know there are add-ons on the controlers that make them bend inwards, your fingers dont slip then!!

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Gioteck-RG1-... 553900&sr=8-3
Posted 18:18 on 02 March 2010
MTMind2's Avatar

MTMind2@ renegade

I mentioned films because many had argued for years that Blu-ray will mean longer games, and this hasn't been the case on the PS3. :)

The main limitation for consoles is their ability to *process* the data available, hence sticking a Blu-ray drive on say the PS2 wouldn't suddenly make the graphics better or the games better on the PS2, it would have just meant more content available per disk, and hence no need for multiple disks.

The same is true for the PS3. Yes, there are other ways you can make use of that space, such as uncompressed audio or structuring a game world where there's no need to change disks when moving to different areas, but overall, whilst Blu-ray is of benefit for PS3 games, the games are not better *because* of Blu-ray.

(EDIT: Hopefully will get back on topic soon ;))
Posted 17:23 on 02 March 2010
renegade's Avatar

renegade@ MTMind2

Though bigger space is not the same as a longer film. It just means they have more room to put pretty stuff :).
Posted 16:04 on 02 March 2010
MTMind2's Avatar

MTMind2@ fps_d0minat0r

More space doesn't equal better game any more than a bigger plate equals a better meal or a longer movie equals a better movie. :-)

That said, the finger slipping argument is a little weak, but it is an example of the myriad of details which need to be considered for each format supported, and therefore the less formats supported for a game, the easier it is for the developer.
Posted 15:33 on 02 March 2010
renegade's Avatar

renegade

Well this is a dev keeping their wallet (MS) happy lol. I dont care either way iv got a Pc :)
Posted 13:30 on 02 March 2010
fps_d0minat0r's Avatar

fps_d0minat0r@ renegade

exactly, adapting the game to keyboard and mouse is more than worrying about a concave or convex trigger.
all their hoping is that the money microsoft paid them is greater than what they could have earnt from ps3 users.
the only logical explanation as to why they wouldnt make it for ps3.

if they really wanted to concentrate on hardware and make the best possible game then why didnt they choose ps3? blu-ray would have given them 50gb content.....i can bet anyone any amount this wont be on multiple DVD's, so dont bother with that arguement.
Posted 13:26 on 02 March 2010
renegade's Avatar

renegade

Oh, so you did not have to do the harder job of balancing out he Pc controllers? Do developers think before they speak xD.
Posted 12:57 on 02 March 2010
El-Dev's Avatar

El-Dev

Don't eat crisps before you play Playstation, fingers won't slip then.
Posted 10:16 on 02 March 2010