The Lord of the Rings: Conquest

The Lord of the Rings: Conquest Preview for Xbox 360

On: Xbox 360PS3PCDS
Review Verdict Read Review
6Out of 10
Back to game info
Lord of the Rings plus Star Wars: Battlefront = Conquest.
Lord of the Rings plus Star Wars: Battlefront = Conquest.

Lord of the Rings plus Star Wars: Battlefront = Conquest.

Do you fancy the idea of being a troll? Not the moronic prat who hangs around a forum posting griefer topics kind, but the large savage kind - the big things in caves that eat hobbits and billy-goats gruff? If you do, sir, then step right this way - because Pandemic Studios and EA might have just the ticket.

Lord of the Rings: Conquest aims to offer thrills in a similar vein to Pandemic's Battlefront: Star Wars series, only with Orcs and Elves in place of Stormtroopers and Wookies. The idea is that you'll get to revisit the biggest battles from the Peter Jackson trilogy - and some that never even took place - by taking on the role of the rank and file troops. If you watched the carnage at The Battle For Helm's Deep and thought, "I could do better than that!" - now's your chance to prove it. The single-player campaign will roughly follow the story of the films but our recent hand-on was with the game's multiplayer hi-jinx, so let's talk about that first.

Conquest's multiplayer offers a selection of team-based modes with variations on the kind of diversions you'll know from any online shooter. There's Capture The Ring (flag), Team Deathmatch (two flavours, as we'll explain in a bit) and Conquest itself - a match based around the tagging and occupation of control points dotted about the map. In each case you'll join either the saintly ranks of The Fellowship n' Friends, or the Dastardly Nasties of Sauron (not the official titles, but you get the idea).

The precise character models you get to choose from will vary depending on the map and which races took part in that particular battle, but whatever the situation you'll be picking from one of four classes. Warriors and Scouts both deal in melee combat - the former doing so in an up-front manner, the latter specialising in sneaky, back-stabbing malarkey. You can probably guess what the Archers attack with, but Mages are a little more complicated: they get a mix of offensive powers, such as lightening bolts, and defensive abilities like protective barriers and firewalls (no, not that kind of firewall).

You can be a big old beastie like this. If you want.

You can be a big old beastie like this. If you want.

We found the mages to be a bit of a handful during our hands-on session, but we can imagine that once mastered they would add a fair amount of strategy to your team tactics. As it was, our skirmishes largely descended into chaotic brawls - though this was no bad thing in of itself. The upper three face buttons will give you access to a variety of attacks - light, heavy and spinny for the melee fighters, arrow and spell types for the archer and mage - while L1/LB gives you a charge that boosts the power of your blows. You've also got buttons for blocking/evading and jumping, so there's a fair old amount to pick up.

The battles themselves are limited to a maximum of eight per side; this number may be dwarfed (hobbited?) by the scale of the cinematic scraps, but it's probably a wise design choice. Even with just sixteen players you'll have more than enough on your plate, what with magic spells, arrows and axes being hurled at your face while some sneaky bugger tries to stab you in the back. On top of that, several of the maps we played featured optional mounts (horses and/or wargs), giving you a faster way of getting about and a new means of attack. Finally, and perhaps most excitingly, you'll have to keep an eye out for special characters: high-scoring players will occasionally find themselves upgraded to Hero-class - so you'll play as Gandalf instead of a standard Mage, or Legolas instead of your standard Archer. Some maps will also offer you the chance to play as the bigger beasties from the LOTR universe, like Ents or trolls. We only got the chance to try our hand at the latter, but it was a lot of fun to go stomping around the map, pummelling all and sundry with our club... or at least it was... our reign of terror was brought to a swift end by a Warrior who climbed our back and stabbed us through the head, a move that you must trigger by attacking from the rear.

The details are, without doubt, the strongest elements of Conquest. Pandemic has been lent a helping hand by Weta Digital (the boffins behind the film's CGI legions) and it clearly shows. It's fun to stomp around as a troll because it looks and feels like a troll. Likewise, playing as a hero is great because it looks and feels like them - you can actually be the orc that killed Sean Bean (and who hasn't wanted to be the orc that killed Sean Bean?). This is particularly fun in Hero Team Deathmatch, when everyone, even n00bs like us, can play as their favourite legend or villain. It may look a bit odd when three Gandalfs are running about Minas Tirith, but who cares? It's enjoyable.

New stuff to check out


To add your comment, please login or register

User Comments

Ghentleman's Avatar
Delete Post


And Ps3. The Game looks realy good. I heard the system was like Star Wars Battle Front 2. I hope the campaign story will contain more Missions then in SWB2.
Anyway, the video shows just about whole Middle-Earth so no fear for small or few maps. Also hope that ALL great characters come forth in the game and a few "side" characters( not less important) like Elrond, Theoden, Eomer, maybe Arwen and solme other characters that are only know by the books or seen in the "Warhammer"-series(like Radagast the Brown).
They have got to make up with the high expectations
Posted 19:21 on 11 January 2009
Delete Post


on xbox 360 ofc..
Posted 12:18 on 06 January 2009
lotr fAN's Avatar
Delete Post

lotr fAN

Posted 12:18 on 06 January 2009
xboxlive's Avatar


i played the demo of this last night,and found it good,online will be good/better if thay sort out the lag.
Posted 07:52 on 05 January 2009
Sablicious's Avatar
Delete Post


^ Are you kidding?? o_0
The RotK ending blows! Where the heck was Sauron? Why did they demean Aragorn by pitting him against some generic troll? Why did they film the 'Sauron ending' but pike out at the last minute and not inclide it?... at least as a DVD extra!? o_0

FotR was by far the best of the trilogy. The second best is subjective, but both sequels were in ho-hum comparison to the first.
Posted 05:48 on 22 December 2008
Nan Desu Ka?'s Avatar
Delete Post

Nan Desu Ka?

Dude, I liked The Return of the King's ending. It added emphasis to the cost everyone paid to save Middle Earth.
Posted 20:34 on 17 December 2008
Wido's Avatar


I'm looking forward to LOTR: Conquest that I'm making a purchase on the Jan 16th, running around like Gandolf and also some other players would be a laugh and be very enjoyable.
Posted 19:27 on 17 December 2008

Game Stats

Technical Specs
Release Date: 16/01/2009
Developer: Pandemic Studios
Publisher: Electronic Arts
Genre: Action
No. Players: 1-8
Rating: PEGI 16+
Site Rank: 11,348 50
View Full Site