Nice One Anxious Waiter, some of the fans of the original fallout want turn based gameplay? So you see an enemy, he sees you.. your engaged in combat...what do you do?
well.. because of the turn based gameplay, not a lot..because your character is stuck in a grid format choosing wether or not to attack, when its not your turn, you cant defend or move behind cover because its turn based remember? if an enemy attacks in real time you have real time reactions and limited time to chose a course of action.. if you insist on playing turn based games you would seriously be better off playing final fantasy or someother turn based shite.
I understand that people dont want the previous two games to be stained by this one, should they have called it by a different name or what?
After me and my mate played fallout 1 and 2 i also thought it was a great game but i cant help but look at fallout 3 and think how much the game will kick ass.
Would you have a better opinion of the game if it wasnt called fallout, is that the only reason.. because it isnt the same as the previous 2 fallouts or do you not like the graphics, gameplay, story? im really interested to know!!
The more i hear people complain the funnier i think it gets, people pleading with game developers to stop and listen to theyre thoughts on what theyre doing wrong! hahahahahahaha
o man o man o man i do hope this gets some of you pissed off a bit more, because i love to watch you squirm! peace and love x
I thought Oblivion was a pretty cool game, and am really looking forward to Fallout 3 even though I didn't like Fallout 1 or 2. This might have something to do with my love of FPS games and the fact that Fallout 3 looks like fantastic RPG/FPS hybrid. It could end up as my favorite game of all time.
P.s. My friends keep on talking about 'Girls'!
What is 'Girls'!
Is it available on the Xbox 360?
Nice One Anxious Waiter, some of the fans of the original fallout want turn based gameplay? So you see an enemy, he sees you.. your engaged in combat...what do you do?
well.. because of the turn based gameplay, not a lot..because your character is stuck in a grid format choosing wether or not to attack, when its not your turn, you cant defend or move behind cover because its turn based remember? if an enemy attacks in real time you have real time reactions and limited time to chose a course of action.. if you insist on playing turn based games you would seriously be better off playing final fantasy or someother turn based shite.
I understand that people dont want the previous two games to be stained by this one, should they have called it by a different name or what?
After me and my mate played fallout 1 and 2 i also thought it was a great game but i cant help but look at fallout 3 and think how much the game will kick ass.
Would you have a better opinion of the game if it wasnt called fallout, is that the only reason.. because it isnt the same as the previous 2 fallouts or do you not like the graphics, gameplay, story? im really interested to know!!
The more i hear people complain the funnier i think it gets, people pleading with game developers to stop and listen to theyre thoughts on what theyre doing wrong! hahahahahahaha
o man o man o man i do hope this gets some of you pissed off a bit more, because i love to watch you squirm! peace and love x
Nice One Anxious Waiter, some of the fans of the original fallout want turn based gameplay? So you see an enemy, he sees you.. your engaged in combat...what do you do?
well.. because of the turn based gameplay, not a lot..because your character is stuck in a grid format choosing wether or not to attack, when its not your turn, you cant defend or move behind cover because its turn based remember? if an enemy attacks in real time you have real time reactions and limited time to chose a course of action.. if you insist on playing turn based games you would seriously be better off playing final fantasy or someother turn based shite.
I understand that people dont want the previous two games to be stained by this one, should they have called it by a different name or what?
After me and my mate played fallout 1 and 2 i also thought it was a great game but i cant help but look at fallout 3 and think how much the game will kick ass.
Would you have a better opinion of the game if it wasnt called fallout, is that the only reason.. because it isnt the same as the previous 2 fallouts or do you not like the graphics, gameplay, story? im really interested to know!!
The more i hear people complain the funnier i think it gets, people pleading with game developers to stop and listen to theyre thoughts on what theyre doing wrong! hahahahahahaha
o man o man o man i do hope this gets some of you pissed off a bit more, because i love to watch you squirm! peace and love x
Hmmmm reailty check needs to be put in place here.
If you informing it to me, you should read my post again and carefully as I was saying. That the previous fallouts were turn-based gameplay style, and fallout 3 being non turn-based.
Maybe this gameplay footage may get your head around it more:
I've noticed in Oblivion, on the xbox 360, that 'draw distance' can be a problem. You'll see a character move off down a road and suddenly vanish at a distance. This isn't really a big problem, as Oblivion is mainly 'close quarters' even when throwing spells around. It could however really affect the game play in Fallout 3. Why? Because I love to play a sniper character in FPS games. I hope this is something the programmers have thought about.
It has had a negative affect, for me, when playing Mercenaries 2. What's the point in including sniper rifles in a game when you have to be so close to a target for them to be drawn in the game world, that you might as well just arm yourself with an assault rifle!
For me, this issue will make Fallout 3 the greatest game of the decade or the greatest disappointment of the decade!
» Go to 's original post
well.. because of the turn based gameplay, not a lot..because your character is stuck in a grid format choosing wether or not to attack, when its not your turn, you cant defend or move behind cover because its turn based remember? if an enemy attacks in real time you have real time reactions and limited time to chose a course of action.. if you insist on playing turn based games you would seriously be better off playing final fantasy or someother turn based shite.
I understand that people dont want the previous two games to be stained by this one, should they have called it by a different name or what?
After me and my mate played fallout 1 and 2 i also thought it was a great game but i cant help but look at fallout 3 and think how much the game will kick ass.
Would you have a better opinion of the game if it wasnt called fallout, is that the only reason.. because it isnt the same as the previous 2 fallouts or do you not like the graphics, gameplay, story? im really interested to know!!
The more i hear people complain the funnier i think it gets, people pleading with game developers to stop and listen to theyre thoughts on what theyre doing wrong! hahahahahahaha
o man o man o man i do hope this gets some of you pissed off a bit more, because i love to watch you squirm! peace and love x
» Go to 's original post
P.s. My friends keep on talking about 'Girls'!
What is 'Girls'!
Is it available on the Xbox 360?
well.. because of the turn based gameplay, not a lot..because your character is stuck in a grid format choosing wether or not to attack, when its not your turn, you cant defend or move behind cover because its turn based remember? if an enemy attacks in real time you have real time reactions and limited time to chose a course of action.. if you insist on playing turn based games you would seriously be better off playing final fantasy or someother turn based shite.
I understand that people dont want the previous two games to be stained by this one, should they have called it by a different name or what?
After me and my mate played fallout 1 and 2 i also thought it was a great game but i cant help but look at fallout 3 and think how much the game will kick ass.
Would you have a better opinion of the game if it wasnt called fallout, is that the only reason.. because it isnt the same as the previous 2 fallouts or do you not like the graphics, gameplay, story? im really interested to know!!
The more i hear people complain the funnier i think it gets, people pleading with game developers to stop and listen to theyre thoughts on what theyre doing wrong! hahahahahahaha
o man o man o man i do hope this gets some of you pissed off a bit more, because i love to watch you squirm! peace and love x
» Go to wazzanut's original post
well.. because of the turn based gameplay, not a lot..because your character is stuck in a grid format choosing wether or not to attack, when its not your turn, you cant defend or move behind cover because its turn based remember? if an enemy attacks in real time you have real time reactions and limited time to chose a course of action.. if you insist on playing turn based games you would seriously be better off playing final fantasy or someother turn based shite.
I understand that people dont want the previous two games to be stained by this one, should they have called it by a different name or what?
After me and my mate played fallout 1 and 2 i also thought it was a great game but i cant help but look at fallout 3 and think how much the game will kick ass.
Would you have a better opinion of the game if it wasnt called fallout, is that the only reason.. because it isnt the same as the previous 2 fallouts or do you not like the graphics, gameplay, story? im really interested to know!!
The more i hear people complain the funnier i think it gets, people pleading with game developers to stop and listen to theyre thoughts on what theyre doing wrong! hahahahahahaha
o man o man o man i do hope this gets some of you pissed off a bit more, because i love to watch you squirm! peace and love x
Hmmmm reailty check needs to be put in place here.
If you informing it to me, you should read my post again and carefully as I was saying. That the previous fallouts were turn-based gameplay style, and fallout 3 being non turn-based.
Maybe this gameplay footage may get your head around it more:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=
» Go to 's original post
» Go to 's original post
It has had a negative affect, for me, when playing Mercenaries 2. What's the point in including sniper rifles in a game when you have to be so close to a target for them to be drawn in the game world, that you might as well just arm yourself with an assault rifle!
For me, this issue will make Fallout 3 the greatest game of the decade or the greatest disappointment of the decade!
Post Comment
Login or register to reply to this topic
Create a new account or login to take part in this topic discussion.