Innovation, 3D, and why decent games writing is still comparatively rare.
Ron Gilbert is a 24-carat-gold gaming legend – the man who brought us Maniac Mansion and The Secret of Monkey Island. Ron's new game, DeathSpank, is coming to PSN and XBLA later this month. Earlier this week we caught up with the man himself to chat about innovation, 3D, and why decent games writing is still comparatively rare.
Q: You've described DeathSpank as being a mix of Diablo and Monkey Island, but I was wondering what your inspiration has been in terms of the story and the setting of the game.
Ron Gilbert: The character DeathSpank was something that I created along with my friend Clayton Kauzlaric, about five years ago, for these comic strips that I put on my website, Grumpy Gamer. We needed this weird, kind of off-the-wall bizarre video game character, which is why we created him, and he was just such an interesting character to us that we really wanted to give him his own game. The story that wraps around DeathSpank, it's a little bit of satire and parody of video games. It's not really in your face with it, it's kind of very subtle. But we really wanted DeathSpank's world to be this bizarre place that doesn't make a lot of sense. Video games just don't make sense a lot of the time, so his world takes on a little bit of that bizarreness. That's the thing behind the way the story is told, what the story is and all that.
Q: One of your old Grumpy Gamer comics pokes fun at the difficulty in getting a publishing deal for original, unusual games. It's interesting to me that DeathSpank is coming out via PSN and Xbox LIVE Marketplace. Do you think that these platforms make it easier for anyone who wants to make a game that doesn't behave itself as much as most mainstream releases?
RG: "Doesn't behave itself" - I like that! Yeah, I think XBLA and PSN are wonderful platforms, for exactly the reason you said. They really allow games to go out there and not have to spend 30 or 40 million dollars to make them. You can have much, much smaller budgets, which allows developers and publishers to take more risks with things, to take chances and do things that are going to be a lot more innovative. I don't think DeathSpank would ever have gotten made as a $30 million game, you know? It's too quirky, but it's absolutely perfect for the downloadable services. I love those services. I think in some ways they really are the future.
Q: Is that the area that interests you then, as opposed to bigger, more mainstream games that have to be tied to the conventional way of doing things?
RG: Yeah, I would much rather make smaller games. I think having smaller development cycles, being able to make more games, faster, being able to take chances and experiment with different things, these are definitely the things I'm interested in. I really hope those services continue to flourish, as I really enjoy doing stuff with them.
Q: There was a heavy technology focus at this year's E3, what with 3D and all the motion control add-ons that are coming out. What do you think of the current state of the industry, and what excites you?
RG: I think some of the things that excite me are the things that can happen with innovation, so that the industry doesn't become stale. For me I think the most exciting thing of all about the industry is seeing it break out of that hardcore game mould. You look at people today, and everyone plays games. Maybe they play them on their iPhone, or maybe on the Wii, or maybe they play them on Facebook, but everybody in the world plays games today. I think that's absolutely fascinating and I really love it, because I think our industry has to break out of the 15-year-old boy we've been focusing on for so long.
Q: Do you think that the more hardcore end of the gaming spectrum is in danger of dying out, in the long term?
RG: No, not at all. I look at hardcore gaming the same way I look at summer blockbuster movies. You know, the summer blockbusters are really important to the movie studios, and in some ways they fuel a lot of their profits. But the movie industry is able to make a lot of different types of movie. They make romantic comedies, they make weird little art films, they do all sorts of interesting things - and I think that's where the games industry is starting to head. The hardcore games may always fuel the profits of large companies, but I see them [publishers] now looking to take chances on other types of games, realising that we need to become a more rounded industry, as films are.
Q: It's an interesting comparison, especially given that cinema embraced 3D first and then the games industry followed...
RG: I don't really like 3D in movies, I find it a little annoying to watch. I've not seen the Nintendo DS, the 3D one, so I can't really comment on that. But I think 3D is always going to be a little bit odd as long as we have to wear glasses. The point at which I can sit in my living room and play an XBLA game on my TV and not wear glasses, I think that's the point when 3D will really take off. As long as you have to wear glasses it's going to be a weird, gimmicky thing.