[ « Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next Page » ]
You'd assume playing with a real person would make things easier, but if anything it's actually harder. When playing with an AI partner you know where you stand. Although there's no command to move to a certain location (a big omission in our book), you can tell him to tag along with you, head on into the level or hold firm by pressing left, up or right on the d-pad respectively. The key to making the best use of your AI partner is deciding when to switch between the aggressive and passive modes for each of these commands. Passive makes him take cover and generally try not to get the attention of enemies, while aggressive sees him taking more risks and making sure the enemy knows he's there - effectively taking the aggro.
By using the on-screen mini-window which shows your partner's position you can pretty effectively move him to the position you want. Tell him to move through the level and then switch to an aggressive hold firm command when enemies are in sight, and he'll do his job. With the aggro on him you can sneak around the side and take out enemies relatively easily. If he starts to take too much heavy fire, a quick tap again right on the d-pad will tell him to play it safe, so he stops firing and takes better cover. You can then take the aggro and give him time to recover. At times it works well, but it's a flawed system with its success depending on the number of enemies and their willingness to rush at you.
With a real partner things aren't as clear cut. The same rules apply, but you've got to work together, with clear roles defined at every encounter and communication needing to be spot on. If you find yourself playing with someone with considerably less ability than you, you might as well forget about it as you'll both be killed, over and over again. When you're shot down you usually get a chance to be given medical aid (unless you take a shotgun to the face), with your partner running in and fixing you up, hopefully before your time is up. Doing this in the open isn't ideal so you're able to drag your partner behind cover - something I found the AI was far better at, despite coming unstuck by grenades on numerous occasions.
Other co-op actions seem great at first but soon become less and less used as you realise you're better off sticking to what you know. Using a shield and working as a team behind it is ok, but it limits your attacking options, and the co-op sniping is something we found very little use for. You'll be forced to use the back to back move at various points (at least once per level) but it feels rather tacked on. You simply spin round and shoot while a tonne of enemies run at you. These set-pieces could have been cut from the game at no real cost. You'll also have to help one another up onto ledges at various points, but at no point did the game feel especially better as a co-op game than any of the others on the market.
All of the problems are compounded by some dull level design and a lack of variety. Every level plays out the same with the final guy needing to be flanked and shot from behind. Given that a number of these areas are little more than outdoor corridors, finding a path around the back without running straight past the super enemy is practically impossible and it ruins the illusion that you're actually outthinking your foe.
Never before in a game have I witnessed so much anger by two people playing together. At times Army of Two makes enjoying it impossible, with the game seemingly trying its hardest to ruin the potential it has. Add some annoyingly placed checkpoints to the list of problems and you have a game that only the most committed will work through - even though it can be finished in six hours on the highest difficulty available from the start. Hovercraft sections are introduced at a number of points, no doubt to spice the gameplay up a little, but they feel dated even compared to the boat sections in Half-Life 2. Throughout the campaign I was waiting for things to kick off and for the game to go up a gear, but the spectacle never came.
When you first use a parachute, sniping enemies below while your partner controls the chute's descent, you get a flash of something brilliant, but later sections make aiming nearly impossible and you can simply fly past most the enemies anyway, making the shooting a diversion at best. You can even perform ridiculous air guitar solos or high fives with your buddy, but they're completely bizarre in the context of the game and largely pointless.
[ « Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next Page » ]






[ 1 | 2 | 3 | Next Page » ]
Bene wrote at 14:47 on 05 March 2008
Seems like you had have a bad day. But Ao2 is not responsible for that. I cannot belief that Ao2 is that bad. Also other reviews are with me.
Rogue Soul wrote at 16:28 on 05 March 2008
Pre-Order Cancelled ;)
Mulac wrote at 16:35 on 05 March 2008
After receiving fairly high scores with other reviews I'm surprised it got a 6 here. :(
NinetiesKid wrote at 16:39 on 05 March 2008
Meh I knew TomO wasn't impressed with the game but as it recieved high scores in other places I'm still very much looking forward to it.
DREKKEN wrote at 16:50 on 05 March 2008
What a negative review. Did you start playing hating this game before you put it in? Sure sounds like it.
Videogamer.com kinda implies you know how to play video games, but i dunno... lol
DH wrote at 17:33 on 05 March 2008
Get over it, it's a heap of averageness, with most scores in the 80 or below bracket. One of the most unremarkable games ever.
MarkToomey-08 wrote at 19:21 on 05 March 2008
army of two looks class
MG wrote at 23:23 on 05 March 2008
you do know its not normal for you to move fast in a precision aiming view, example CoD 4, you kind of make yourself sound inept and just not too great of a player in general
FRUSTRATEDMIKE wrote at 00:44 on 06 March 2008
I bought it yesterday. I'm a big fan of COD 4 and gears of war. All I can say it's try this game, this is F***** awesome. The weapons upgrade is nice.
Supyo wrote at 02:05 on 06 March 2008
This reviewer doesn't have much wrong. The big problems he didnt even mention. The multiplayer is very very buggy if not unplayable. I can't believe i wasted my money on this game.
Angel wrote at 02:10 on 06 March 2008
I like this review it shows indeph detail on the negatives of the game and thats what I was needing to find. ALl I could find is mostly the greatness of the game and I know it isnt perfect so I appreciate this review.
AriGold wrote at 02:49 on 06 March 2008
You had a bad day, hug out it bitch. Do the same review again in a week.
baccardi84 wrote at 07:38 on 06 March 2008
seriously, a lot of the complaints here are just as valid in any other FPS, but you punish Ao2 as if it's the only one that does it.
The enemies all look the same? sorry, they do in ever single fps ever made, even your beloved gears of war and halo.
game play gets repetative? sorry, all games are repetative.
movement is slow in precision mode? sorry, all fps's do this.
characters should be more serious? you don't like high-fives? sorry, it's a game, and it's not based in realism.
sounds like you had a hard time playing and didn't take the time to get better. too bad for you. i played with a friend and had a great time. just as fun as halo or gears of war, just not as polished. just as those games are overrated, this one has been underrated by you.
lastdual wrote at 15:58 on 06 March 2008
Someone's been playing too much COD.
Unlike that game, in AO2 you don't constantly have to look down the sights in order to shoot straight. Guns are actually effective shooting normally, and even blindfire is very accurate compared to other games. This slower-moving aiming retical when looking down the sights is not an issue at all and actually balances the gameplay.
Sorry, but some of the control issues mentioned here are more about the reviewer's personal preferences than actual faults.
kevin wrote at 22:22 on 06 March 2008
im sorry but yall are dumb..u must have sucked at tha game or sumthin cause it is way better than a six..being serious if yall give this a six then you should stop rating video games
NinetiesKid wrote at 23:09 on 06 March 2008
From what I've played so far I'd say an 8/10 would have been about right. The controls feel so smooth and fluid and they were my one worry about the game but it plays so much better than it looks in the videos. Definitely glad I purchased this. Also, people worried about aiming and accuracy with the guns - it's actually a really good balance like if you fire in bursts it's accurate but the recoil is realistic so if you're just spitting the bullets out it's harder to aim but it feels real. I don't know if people are worried about this actually maybe it was just me but in gameplay videos on gametrailers it looked really hard to aim it's not I just think the people who were playing it must have been bad :p
Flamboastin wrote at 04:57 on 07 March 2008
Its a decent game at best.. I beat it on hard in 5 n a half hours.. Im tired of games like Frontlines: FOW and COD4 who have these short singleplayer modes then rely on the multiplayer to make up for it, and in this case AO2 multiplayer sort of does.. Its fun, but defantly more agervating then fun.. If i could go back in time i wouldnt have bought the game and jus saved my money for Condemned 2, but i cant.. So ill tell you guys this, RENT IT FIRST, then if you like it buy it.. But for most it'll be a total disapointment/letdown.
H3llra1z3r wrote at 12:07 on 07 March 2008
Ok! I got frustrated how the target reticule sits on the rightt, would be nice to have a button to swap from left to right. IMO this game would reach 9.0 - -9.5 if they fixed this. Pimping weapons FTW
[ 1 | 2 | 3 | Next Page » ]