Super Mario All-Stars Review
- 1
- 2
I won't lie to you: I belonged to SEGA as a kid. I grew up with Streets of Rage, Ecco the Dolphin and a certain blue hedgehog. But don't reach for those pitchforks just yet; I get rather nostalgic about Nintendo's portly Italian plumber, too. One balmy summer, I swapped my Mega Drive for a SNES with a school chum of mine. The exchange was steeped in controversy, with other boys in our class mortally offended that we would do such a thing. The playground was a bitter place; you were loyal to one console and one console only, and you'd defend it with all the smack talk you could muster. But a bit of stick from my fellow SEGA loyalists was worth it, as that summer I got to experience the joys of Super Mario All-Stars for the very first time.
Just as I was able to all those years ago, a new generation can now experience the series for the first time with Super Mario All-Stars on Wii. Despite appearing in disc form for the very first time , the compilation is only a direct port: as the back of the box puts it, "the content of this game is the same as the original SNES game". So, that's Super Mario Bros., Super Mario Bros.: The Lost Levels, Super Mario Bros. 2 and Super Mario Bros. 3 in their full 16-bit glory. As was the case back in 1993, the compilation also welcomes save files, meaning you no longer have to complete the games in one sitting.
Considering the game celebrates 25 years of all things Mario, many people will be disgruntled to discover that Super Mario World isn't on the disc. The game made an appearance on an alternative All-Stars compilation released in 1994, meaning it would have been incredibly easy to whack that ROM on a disc instead. Ninty were obviously thinking with their wallets - Super Mario World is available on the Virtual Console, after all - and fans might feel slightly short changed as a result. Slightly more distressing is the lack of 60hz support. As the game only runs in 50hz, those annoying black borders encroach on each side of the screen, which is just as annoying as you might imagine.
But let's not get bogged down in technical troubles. Even after twenty-five years, the games themselves are still fantastic and offer some of the best 2D platforming the genre has ever seen. I'm not going to bother explaining the nitty-gritty of the gameplay – you know how it works. You run, you jump, you hit question-mark branded boxes with your noggin, you eat mushrooms, you double in size, you jump on the heads of Goombas and Koopa Troopers, you relentlessly move through level after level, world after world to save a captured princess; it's one of the most reassuringly familiar formulas in video game history.
Things are slightly different in Super Mario Bros. 2, however, which finds Mario and pals (including Princess Peach herself) tossing root vegetables at their enemies instead of jumping on their heads. Aesthetically speaking it's rather different to anything else in All-Stars, as well as being the only game in the compilation to feature a health meter. It's not surprising the game looks and plays so differently though - it wasn't originally intended to be part of the series. Released as Yume Kōjō: Doki Doki Panic in Japan, Nintendo simply skinned the game with Mario characters and gave it a change of name for its US release. It's not a bad game necessarily; it's just not very Mario.



Highest Rated Comment
Ghost_Dog
No Super Mario World is lunacy.
User Comments
pblive
squidman@ Ghost_Dog
Clearly neither problem gravely faults the compilation, but I promised myself I'd never play another neutered 50hz game after all that bull***** at the start of the PS2 era. I think it was around about the time Capcom released a 50hz version of the original Devil May Cry. Gits.
MJTH
I understand the criticisms though, no 60Hz is annoying, but the no Super Mario World can be justified I guess, people who don't have it on the virtual console would be annoyed, but the people who are most likely will buy this for the nostalgia value, like me, will probably already have Super Mario World from the VC anyway so I guess nintendo could argue why they didn't put it on the disc.
Bloodstorm@ Ghost_Dog
Woffls
No Super Mario World is good marketing :P
Chances are, people who genuinely think that game is so incredible will have it on Virtual Console already, right? Unless they just say that Super Mario World is the best 2D Mario game ever but still don't care about playing it...
I had this pre-ordered then canceled it when I realised that I'm one of those people that just plays it for 5 minutes then gets bored.
IamBugged
Ghost_Dog
No Super Mario World is lunacy.