FIFA 14 Features for PS Vita

On: PS VitaPS4Xbox OneXbox 360PS3PC3DSiPhone
Back to game info
FIFA 14 screenshot
FIFA 14 screenshot

February 2013, New York: Sony unveils the PlayStation 4 to a series of obligatory whoops and cheers. An apology as much as an announcement, it stressed how easy and open to develop for this machine was in comparison to PS3. Talk of SPEs, Cells, and working two jobs to pay for the latest machine was replaced with an affable, proud, yet knowing presentation. 'We f**ked up', was what the company essentially said. 'And we're trying to fix it.'

To do so, the Japanese firm had to change its ethos. Out went proprietary technology and baffling software toolkits. In came well-known parts, upgraded to match the specs it was aiming for. Sony broke down its choices piece by piece on stage, attempting to demystify the process. No more wooly statements about a processor so powerful it makes Skynet look like something V-Tech knocked out in 1999.

It was a move that saw the company deliberately make a play for the affections (and talents) of developers, which it had been courting behind the scenes months before the event itself. A more PC-like architecture would ensure that the machine was easy to develop for, and wouldn't stumble out of the gate as developers got to grips with proprietary hardware. It also meant that for all intents and purposes the two machines that would vie for domination of the living room would, in terms of hardware, be closer than ever.

Earlier console generations were defined by marked power differences, vastly different architectures and even differing moral standards, each of which had defined the machines. SNES and Mega Drive owners would have very different libraries, even different versions of games with the same name (Aladdin and Mortal Kombat, for example). Saturn and the original PlayStation were 2D and 3D behemoths, respectively. PS2 and the original Xbox were also separated by a gulf in power and hardware design. And then, of course, came the differences between PS3 and Xbox 360, even if it didn't really matter in the long run.

Now, it is services that will prove to be a key differentiator. Third-party exclusives are relics: it's simply too expensive to gamble on one console. First-party titles – Uncharted, Gears, Forza, Gran Turismo – still have the power to move consoles, and will drive players to a certain platform holder.

That won't change. What will change, over time, is how Sony and Microsoft adapt their systems to tempt players with what it can do other than play games. The last generation saw an incredible evolution in services: compare the original 360 dashboard (remember the Blade system?) to what lurks there now. Barring a fifty-fold (roughly) increase in adverts and Other Bullshit™, the visual and mechanical differences are obvious.

watch dogs1 -

PS3 didn't change its XMB, but like the 360 it evolved in other, more important ways: apps. Netflix, Lovefilm, Skype; Sony and Microsoft's consoles started as (in terms of power) the ultimate gaming machines, with an eye on the broader prize of taking over the entire living room for themselves. They ended the generation several significant steps closer to achieving that goal.

Xbox One takes this to its logical conclusion, wanting to be at the literal centre of your technology. TV. TV. TV. TV. The tagline 'Xbox One, Input One', and that you can plug your cable/satellite box into it to be controlled with the machine, sums up Microsoft's goals nicely.

The strategy, along with Kinect and the added price, has naturally turned some gamers off, enabling Sony to campaign under the banner of being 'For the Players'. It's a great PR line, but having the movie and music stores in the main section of the dash when you first boot it says a lot about what the company has in mind for this generation.

Cashing in on ancillary media is only one part of the plan, however, and Sony seem to have understood that people still buy these machines to play games. The proof is in the services that Sony offers up under the PlayStation Plus banner: a key innovation from the firm that, if indicative of the future, shows how far ahead of the game Hirai's company is over its American rivals.

Whereas Microsoft has stood still in recent years, continuing to charge for Xbox Live Gold and yet failing to add any additional value, Sony has grown PlayStation Plus into a juggernaut. Free games are the obvious appeal, but it's the frequency of updates to the roster that makes it so worthwhile. Microsoft's piss-weak equivalent, Games with Gold, only highlights the differences between the two firms: Sony is offering nearly new titles. MS? 360 launch games.

In many ways, the closeness in power underlines a key truth that platform holders are totally aware of yet don't actually like to admit: that more 'power', measured in terms of bits (like it used to be) or other yardsticks, is usually not an indicator of the actual 'winner' of any console war.

Instead, it's games and the services that underpin them that dictates the outcome (how many people stayed loyal to Microsoft because of Xbox Live?). How each machine supports or enhances certain triple-A titles is going to be vital: Watch Dogs, Call of Duty, FIFA and Battlefield aren't just games, they're platforms. How PS4 and Xbox One offer these experiences is going to be of increasing importance.

So far, Sony's commitment to PlayStation Plus, as well as Microsoft's many design and marketing blunders, sees it winning this battle. But everything can change in an instant.

New stuff to check out


To add your comment, please login or register

User Comments

Christie's Avatar


uptil I saw the bank draft which said $5654, I have faith that my friend actually bringing in money part time on their apple laptop.. there friends cousin haz done this 4 less than 11 months and resently paid the mortgage on their house and bourt a top of the range Jaguar E-type. pop over to this web-site ------>
Go to website and click Home tab for more details.
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ ❤❤❤❤❤
Posted 03:03 on 07 December 2013
Mike80's Avatar

Mike80@ Tommo777

no offence taken, although thanks for considering it. I was reffering to the departing generation yes, regarding ps4 and x1, i have both and can see flaws and success' in them equally. time will tell which one i spend most time on but as you say, there is no gwg for x1 announced yet, so sony is of to a better start with psn on ps4 (apart from forcing me to change my password twice in its first week). for now, just annoyed that the vita cant be used on ps4.
Posted 16:40 on 06 December 2013


Lot of rage about this one. I think it's quite accurate actually. Love to see people raging in comment threads when you insult there favorite corporation....

What I do find funnier though is every time you listen to a song or watch a movie on an Xbox service, Sony will more than likely get a cut of that because they own a lot of the artists and movies their streaming. Think about that.

I'm glad to see Sony has taken the opportunity to charge for online services, whilst at the same time not pay-walling other services like netflix which MS do. This should hopefully lead to an experience closer to Live than the crappy "Moving Server" experience of the PS3 with it's rubbish P2P client server model. Seems live had Sony worried during the last gen like free games has MS worried during this new generation.

I found games with gold quite an insult considering how much money I've put in to the console. Six year old games and people telling me I should be grateful for them. I'm afraid I've only got one thing to say to people who keep telling me that. Do one!

At the end of the day, we're looking at two separate strategies, one targeting people who mostly want to play games and people who just to be generally entertained between FIFA matches.

I do think "the cloud" will play an important role in this generation, as it is in the rest of the world of computing. But I work on the cloud platform MS uses for its infrastructure and it's nothing Sony couldn't do using the Google App engine!

Posted 09:18 on 06 December 2013
Tommo777's Avatar

Tommo777@ Mike80

In terms of ps3 and xbox 360 you are correct
However with ps plus i can decide i dont want free games, not pay and still play online, not with live

In terms of ps4 and xbox one you are wrong, ps plus is now for online just as live is only difference between the two is that ps plus offers better quality, more frequent free games
That might have been what the author of this article was getting at
I mean you no offence by this post, and i hope you dont take it as an insult

In my opinion both consoles are as good as each other for their own individual pros and cons
Posted 01:28 on 06 December 2013
Mike80's Avatar


The only part of this article I don't agree with is your view on Games with gold. Gwg was a response from Microsoft, it was never the point of your live subscription. Playstation plus IS the free games, where as Gwg is a bonus on top of what you were already getting. Live was great for 7 years before Gwg, 2 old games for free is just a cherry on top, not the cake itself.

At least last generation anyway, who knows how it plays out this generation.
Posted 23:04 on 05 December 2013

Game Stats

Release Date: 27/09/2013
Developer: Electronic Arts
Publisher: EA
Genre: Sports
Rating: PEGI 3+
Site Rank: 1,744 11
View Full Site