As it stands LittleBigPlanet is an entertaining platfomer, highly polished training tool and potential gateway to greatness. We're hoping it will end up being much more.
Latest Videos
Little Big Planet
Shadow of the Colossus DLC Teaser Trailer
Shadow of the Colossus DLC Teaser Trailer
Little Big Planet
VideoGamer.com's Top 10 Games of 2008
VideoGamer.com's Top 10 Games of 2008
» Go to 's original post
Im not mad that a ps3 title didn't get full marks or it had faults, but i think for an exclusive on the PS3, we can say it has a top end game. A game that's finally lived up to its hype, which is a hard thing to do. Imo Halo 2/3 should of got a 9 because its way too repetitive.
I just cant understand why this game didn't get a 10 really.
Its good it got a 9, just surprised because its different.
» Go to 's original post
http://www.play.com/Games/PlayStatio...s.html?cpage=4
» Go to 's original post
» Go to 's original post
I own a PS3, but even I wouldn't give this game a 10. It looks fun, but not anywhere near the "best platformer". The gameplay is NOT as deep or precise as games like Mario Galaxy, for instance. I suspect many of these acne-covered, cave-dwelling fanboys would probably be bitching that the same game didn't deserve a 9 if it came out for any system beside the PS3.
» Go to 's original post
That was the shortest game I've ever played... no time to get used to controls and you reach the end.
LBP got a 8 in gameplay, because the reviewer can't push the jump button? Cool, you rocks, indeed.
» Go to 's original post
» Go to 's original post
» Go to 's original post
» Go to 's original post
Bioshock - 10/10 - 9 is more than sufficient
HALO 3 - 10/10 - Yes it does
GoW2 - 10/10 - yes it does deserve too
But so do Mgs4 LBP n Fallout3 deserve 10
» Go to 's original post
» Go to 's original post
Rate 'Chess' out of 10.
Instead of crying over the review score, try reading the review. It is completely fair, and the reviewer gave his reasons for marking it down. Whilst I personally would give the game a 10 as well, I can not argue with the complaint about jumping. Several times I died completely randomly because the game decided I was on a different plane than I actually wanted to be on. Or I got squashed by the scenery.
The major complaint I have is that the review was written before the game was played thoroughly. Stating that you couldn't play the levels co-operatively online means you have missed at least one facet of the games greatness. Perhaps it would be wise to replay some of the levels this way, in order to see what it adds to the game?
Rate 'Chess' out of 10.
Instead of crying over the review score, try reading the review. It is completely fair, and the reviewer gave his reasons for marking it down. Whilst I personally would give the game a 10 as well, I can not argue with the complaint about jumping. Several times I died completely randomly because the game decided I was on a different plane than I actually wanted to be on. Or I got squashed by the scenery.
The major complaint I have is that the review was written before the game was played thoroughly. Stating that you couldn't play the levels co-operatively online means you have missed at least one facet of the games greatness. Perhaps it would be wise to replay some of the levels this way, in order to see what it adds to the game?
» Go to CheekyLee's original post
Pros:
- Huge levels of strategic depth.
- High replay value.
- Nice variety of pieces.
- Huge user community worldwide.
- Features horse-shaped pieces that move in an L-shape. Very unusual.
- Board is backwards-compatible with your old Draughts set.
Cons:
- Most sets do not come with a clock, which is more or less essential for serious play.
- The difficulty curve is very steep.
- There is no element of luck involved, which arguably reduces the fun since there is no real way that a master could ever lose to an inferior player.
- The black vs white theme is a bit racist (perhaps).
I give chess 9 out of 10.Last edited on Mon 26 January 2009 by mydeaddog
» Go to 's original post
Hopefully, you got the point. Chess could only be a 10, and yet you somehow managed to conspire to rob it of a point. Someone else would give it a 5 for reasons of "It is too slow-paced.", and "You are stuck waiting for your opponent to move." (Though your post was quite lulzworthy!)
» Go to 's original post
I totally see what you're saying, though, and I agree. The main body of a review is always more important than the number at the end, but unfortunately scores are something that people will always gravitate towards.
» Go to 's original post
Post Comment
Login or register to reply to this topic
Create a new account or login to take part in this topic discussion.