Haze Review

For:PS3  Also On: Xbox 360PC Release Date: 22 May 2008
Visually it has moments, but it's generally quite uninspired.
Visually it has moments, but it's generally quite uninspired.

Visually it has moments, but it's generally quite uninspired.

Haze's campaign is pretty unspectacular, lacking in spectacular moments and set-pieces that other modern shooters have in spades. Problems caused by dumb AI squad mates, instant kills from unseen rockets and unimpressive vehicle controls don't help matters - trying to manoeuvre a buggy along a narrow road with instant death on either side isn't fun. As original and unique as the Nectar administrating gameplay sounded, by the end of the short six-hour campaign (less if you're at all experienced with the genre) you'll be glad it's all over. In fact the last level gives the appearance of being cut to pieces, with a high-speed vehicle section losing any sense of excitement because of constant fades to black to skip to slightly later moments in time.

The core gameplay behind Haze isn't bad at all. Gun-play is solid, with the zoomed in view allowing anyone with some experience and enough accuracy to take down enemies with relative ease. Weapons feel powerful too, able to down enemies without the need to unload tons of lead. None of this matters though when you're up against enemies that don't seem to care about self preservation (the fact that they're high on Nectar is no excuse). Level design isn't great either, like the terrible missile carrier escort mission which requires you to guard the slowest moving vehicle known to man as it moves across a bridge. I dislike escort missions at the best of times, but this particular level tested my patience to near breaking point.

By far the biggest criticism I can level at Haze is how dated it feels. Nothing about the single-player campaign feels fresh once you're through the opening few levels, with environments, gameplay and combat feeling like the games we were playing on the original Xbox and PlayStation 2. This doesn't make Haze a bad game, but just nothing we haven't played over and over again in the past few years. The storyline is one of its defining features, but some cheesy acting and a dodgy script often lessen the serious impact it could have had.

Haze's potential saviour is its multiplayer functionality. The 16-player online competitive play is solid and works well online, offering plenty of game modes and an in-game friends list. You've got your standard deathmatch and team deathmatch as well as an object-based game mode that should offer some decent matches once the servers are full. It's hard to see Haze's online component drawing too many players over from CoD4, but decent sales should see it gain a strong user base.

Co-op play and competitive multiplayer are decent, but not game saving.

Co-op play and competitive multiplayer are decent, but not game saving.

Perhaps an even bigger selling point is the four-player drop in and out co-op online or LAN - two players are supported via split-screen. Played with real people taking the place of AI team mates the game is better, there's no question about it. You no longer have to contend with allies running directly into your line of fire and it no longer takes two to three guys to take down a single enemy. It does make the game incredibly easy though, making it possible to run through the levels in double quick time. Had this co-op been slotted into an all-round more exciting campaign we'd be singing its praises no end, but sadly here it just makes a disappointing game a little bit more entertaining.

Much has been made of Haze's exclusivity to the PlayStation 3, with many believing this would allow for some of the best visuals seen on the console. Although Free Radical's game isn't ugly, it has the look of a PC game from a few years ago, and pales in comparison to the likes of Halo 3, Gears of War and Resistance. For the most part it runs at a smooth frame rate, only bogging down during intense fire-fights, but it still disappoints considering its status as a high-profile PS3 exclusive. Little blemishes like AI soldiers repeatedly walking into walls or into fire don't help, and on numerous occasions my checkpoint save would re-load with my character stuck in some scenery - nothing that couldn't be overcome, but sloppy nonetheless.

Haze is far from a complete disaster but, given the high level of hype surrounding its release and the pedigree of developer Free Radical, it still stands as one of the biggest disappointments of this generation. Good ideas are there, but it all descends into a bog standard FPS before too long. Playing with friends is definitely the way to go if you can, avoiding the dodgy AI team mates as much as possible, but this can't make up for a lacklustre campaign and underwhelming presentation. While certainly better than Turok and other severe disappointments the FPS genre has seen in recent months, Haze is nowhere near the classic slice of entertainment we originally expected.

VideoGamer.com Score

6Score out of 10
  • Co-op is handled well
  • Decent multiplayer
  • Soon becomes too generic
  • Drab visuals

New stuff to check out

To add your comment, please login or register

User Comments

haze rulz's Avatar
Delete Post

haze rulz

i think its a really goodgame and i hope there be a 1,2 and 3 more hazes i think the snipers are better than call of dutys and halo sucks eggs and so does cod4 haze rulz ha ha ha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted 09:40 on 14 September 2008
Anonymous's Avatar
Delete Post

Anonymous

graphics are crap ps2 in semi hd cheapo bin game 70 euros no way more like 20euros
Posted 21:22 on 18 June 2008
fish's Avatar
Delete Post

fish

p:s ther not good a reviews i could do better im just a kid
Posted 13:06 on 07 June 2008
fish's Avatar
Delete Post

fish

this is rite now the best game i have on ps3 i have 8 wich is ok because they cost $100 a game but i think this game rocks all you losers you say some thing als its because you dont have a ps3 or this game you just say what the people say and to tell the truth the people suck at that
Posted 13:02 on 07 June 2008
hmm's Avatar
Delete Post

hmm

well has to be said this game is a complete waste of money. i got it hoping for a true next gen game that (given the hype) was gona b outstanding. what i did get was cheesy soldiers, sh*t AI, lame graphics, appauling textures, uncontrollable vehicles, grahpics dissappearing in places and 'sebeen there done that bought hte tshirt' gameplay. this review gives it a bit to much credit. ive since traded mine back in, seriously not worth the cash tho. im PS3 all the way but theres no hiding it guys this one looses big time :(
Posted 23:29 on 03 June 2008
Genghis_Kant's Avatar

Genghis_Kant

The game seems adequte, just not great.However I have heard the online and co-op are top notch. That should count for something in the review. So maybe a 7 is fairer.
Still, I feel Haze has suffered from the backlash that comes from high expectation and hype. If the game could'nt quite deliver it gets a right kicking. If it had'nt shouted as much as it did for months and months I'm sure there would've been a little less acid in the reviews.
That said, from Free Radical I was expecting better.
Posted 11:56 on 28 May 2008
pblive's Avatar

pblive@ Handwipe

Quote:
Originally Posted by Handwipe
I've been saying Haze would turn out like this ever since I heard about this shameless Halo knock-off. Next year KZ2 will also be an epic failure.

Because Halo was the first FPS?

Your posts always bring a smile to my face.
Posted 14:22 on 27 May 2008
stone's Avatar
Delete Post

stone

I bought this game today, I have played 3 levels and that is about enough for me, i will be swapping it at EB games tommorrow. Its not terrible but does feel dated. There are a few nice visuals but not many. I also own both consoles but still believe the PS3 to be superior. GT5 , motorstorm , Drakes fortune , call of duty 4 , heavenly sword. Xbox 360 tends to be more for teenagers weras the playstation tends to be more of an adult console.
Posted 12:39 on 27 May 2008
wyp100's Avatar

wyp100

@XC_WAY

That's quite possibly the most rediculous thing I've read on the Internet in a long time. And that's saying something.
Posted 12:33 on 27 May 2008
XC_WAY's Avatar
Delete Post

XC_WAY

I loved Haze, I don't know what the deal is with this review. I played on a 50" Plasma and the graphics were great. Resistance, on the other hand, looked like crap compared to Haze.

I work in the Apple/Mac industry and I know for a FACT that companies pay for good "editorial reviews", hell, I used to write them for money and/or product, so I know it happens. I'm getting the feeling that Free Radical didn't pay out because they knew this game was good. But, when you don't pay you get crap reviews. That's the way it is in the computer websites, probably the same here. That's sad because being a video game player (at 34 years old) for just a couple of years, I own both PS3 and Xbox360 and depend on reviews for good games. I bought this one before reading reviews because it looked good and I had just finished a great game the week before. That said, had I not pre-bought it and had read this review I might not have bought it.

If you decide not to buy because of this review you're cheating yourself out of a great, gorgeous, game.
Posted 01:37 on 27 May 2008
Handwipe's Avatar

Handwipe

I've been saying Haze would turn out like this ever since I heard about this shameless Halo knock-off. Next year KZ2 will also be an epic failure.
Posted 06:00 on 26 May 2008
anon's Avatar
Delete Post

anon

why is it relevant if this game is exclusive or not? end of the day a game with crap devlopment will still be crap, regardless of the power of the console. fanboys need to learn that any game can be good on any system if enough time and effort is put into it.

in the case of haze, it had time, but no thought or effort put into it.
Posted 03:55 on 24 May 2008
Devin's Avatar
Delete Post

Devin

People who gives a crap about what system is better, in my opinion they are both decent in their own ways. own both xbox and ps3. to me this game looks like sh*t and i tend towards ps3 games. Halo in my opinion is sh*tty, i would have to say the killzone franchise is better but i havent played the new one. the ps3 does have more graphics power hands down, COD4 looks way better on ps3 than 360 and GTA4 looks better too. and i do play on HD. people argue live is better than psn but id say they are pretty close to the same. you also have to consider the ps3 is a much harder console to develope games on where as the 360 is very similar to the pc's development. Give it a break with 360 is better all ps3 exclusives suck. ps3 has been on the market less time than the 360 and does have some decent titles comming out in the near future. You also have to remember that the ps market has not always been shooters it is more of the rpg fantasy, sports family console where as the xbox 1 was a hard core m rated system with all the fps and hardcore games made for the teens and young adults (military guys) both systems have their goods and bads hardware wise ps3 better, gameplay xbox better . I prefer ps3 myself. this is just an opinion. psn Fuoman Xbox live Devin003
Posted 02:51 on 24 May 2008
Kiroquai's Avatar

Kiroquai

It's... okay online. Nothing too special, but still good fun. Call of Duty 4's multiplayer is better, mind, That said, I completely agree with the review when it comes to the single player being a bit todge; it really isn't very good at all.

To avoid being called a Microsoft fanboy, I:

a) Work in the industry and can't be bothered what platform my games are for

and

b) Earn enough to own all three so don't have to justify my purchases by talking ********.
Posted 17:36 on 23 May 2008
cheese's Avatar
Delete Post

cheese

still think it will be an okay game im sure it will be great online xbox fanboys are just jealous
Posted 16:33 on 23 May 2008

Game Stats

Go to Haze PlayStation 3 Game Index

Review Summary: Far from a complete disaster but, given the high level of hype surrounding its release and the pedigree of developer Free Radical, Haze still stands as one of the biggest disappointments of this gen.

Our Score: 6 out of 10
Developer: Free Radical Design
Publisher: Ubisoft
Genre: First Person Shooter
No. Players: 1-16
Rating: PEGI 18+
Site Rank: 1,443 49