Brink blurs the line between offline and online. But then you knew that.
Brink blurs the line between offline and online. But then you knew that.

Brink blurs the line between offline and online. But then you knew that.

Sometimes, it's the little things that stand out. With Brink, it's the "vip" you hear as bullet fire whizzes by your head; it's the third-person camera perspective the Operative class can view the game in when hacking terminals; it's the Mirror's Edge-style movement, triggered from one, very S.M.A.R.T. button; and it's the cool hoodie you've customised so you look the part when stealthing about. But, as experience has taught us, so many good ideas remain just that, and fail to gel together into a cohesive, fun whole. Will Brink suffer a similar fate?

No, is fast-talking Splash Damage CEO Paul Wedgewood's answer. And to prove it, he plays Brink for half an hour at publisher Bethesda's Gamers Day event in France, showing an assembled throng of journalists that his shooter is not just great in theory, but great in practice.

I'm loath to say that Brink blurs the line between offline and online, because it's been said of the game a million times before, but really it's true. At its core Brink is an evolution of Splash Damage's still popular team-based competitive multiplayer FPS series Enemy Territory; eight versus eight, two rival factions, a near-future urban setting, impressive character customisation, persistent player progression and lots and lots of upgrades. But - and this is the cool part - it's a game that does its very best to fool you into thinking you're playing an entirely different game.

Say, for example, you start a Resistance mission on your lonesome. You'll be playing with seven AI-controlled comrades against eight AI-controlled Security bots. But if you're connected to the internet, those bots can be replaced by real world players who slot seamlessly alongside you, or against you, turning Brink from an offline shooter into an online shooter in the blink of an eye.

That, in of itself, isn't so revolutionary. Brink's genius, however, is in how it dynamically reacts to what players are doing and what class they're playing. Objectives, picked up from captured command posts, update according to the to and fro of the match and the class make-up of the players. Say, for example, you're playing as the Soldier class. The game will offer you objectives of the blowing stuff up variety, usually to be completed using the soldier's heavy explosive charge. But if you're a sneaky Operative, you may be offered a mission to hack a computer terminal. Or, if you're an Engineer, you may be tasked with placing landmines and turrets.

Brink is being built using a version of id Tech 4 modified so players permanently host servers just in case someone drops in to play

Brink is being built using a version of id Tech 4 modified so players permanently host servers just in case someone drops in to play

Why should I bother to do anything other than shooting people in the face? Good question. Splash Damage openly admits it'll bribe players with experience points to get them to do some of the more team friendly objectives. You'll get loads of XP for healing as the Medic, for example, for capturing command posts and, generally, for doing the kind of stuff that tends not to grab the headlines, but helps inch your team forward towards its ultimate goal.

Paul's shown Brink's good ideas off in previous demonstrations, but it's reassuring to see them come together. And it's even more reassuring to see that in focusing on making those good ideas as good as they can be, Splash Damage hasn't forgotten the bread and butter; Brink's weapons, from pistols and sub machine guns to assault rifles and grenade launchers, look and sound fantastic. Each has a unique impact and feel, and carries real, satisfying weight. Player movement, fuelled by S.M.A.R.T., looks responsive and fluid. For all of Brink's clever line blurring, simply running and gunning and shooting someone in the face looks like it'll be immense fun.

New stuff to check out

8 Comments

To add your comment, please login or register

User Comments

RAGE_OF_THORN's Avatar

RAGE_OF_THORN

Sounds like heaps of boring repetition. YAWN....

Moving on to something interesting.
Posted 11:23 on 12 May 2010
Ed2287's Avatar

Ed2287

Looks juicy sounds interesting... time will tell I suppose.

Part of me thinks it will flop?
Posted 20:14 on 11 May 2010
Tokamak's Avatar

Tokamak@ Wido

Brink is effectively a multiplayer shooter, but the matches that are being played follow such a strong narrative that you can play the matches against bots offline and still have a very worthy singleplayer experience.

It's great that you mention borderlands.

Borderlands is essentially a singleplayer turned multiplayer with it's very strong co-op but little versus elements.

Brink is exactly the other way around. It's multiplayer leaning towards singleplayer.
Posted 16:25 on 11 May 2010
Bloodstorm's Avatar

Bloodstorm

Is it wrong that i've NEVER heard of this?
Posted 15:02 on 11 May 2010
scaz2244's Avatar

scaz2244

seems pretty good, always quite intrested in this! werent it supposed to be out last year?
Posted 10:43 on 11 May 2010
SexyJams's Avatar

SexyJams

More and more games seem to be very online based. We're really starting to see games take advantage of the Live service, with games such as MAG being solely multiplayer.
I just feel sorry for all the people with the internet for it.
Posted 09:33 on 11 May 2010
wyp100's Avatar

wyp100@ Wido

My impression is that the game is structured like a traditional single-player story-driven shooter, with levels and cut scenes. You won't be able to hit the level cap from one play through, so to continue up the experience ladder, you'll be encouraged to hit multiplayer after completion, if you haven't already done so.
Posted 08:33 on 11 May 2010
Wido's Avatar

Wido

This is definitely one game I have been interested in. The whole idea of this game really, is that you can already get the majority through Borderlands for example. Nonetheless its got Bethesda on the case which they don't seem to disappoint.

Question Wes.

Is the singleplayer done in levels? Or does it offer quests and such which it seems it doesn't. I'm guessing the multiplayer is the only driving force of replay-ability.
Posted 08:10 on 11 May 2010

Game Stats

Release Date: 13/05/2011
Developer: Splash Damage
Publisher: Bethesda Softworks
Genre: First Person Shooter
No. Players: 1-16
Rating: PEGI 16+
Site Rank: 3,386
View Full Site