Devil May Cry 4 is £10 more on the PS3, despite both versions being near identical.
Devil May Cry 4 is £10 more on the PS3, despite both versions being near identical.

Devil May Cry 4 is £10 more on the PS3, despite both versions being near identical.

Capcom's Devil May Cry 4 has made quite a splash, not least because it's a ruddy good hack and slash, but because of that age old bug bear - cost. A couple of weeks ago the Internet blew up when it was revealed that the game would be £10 more expensive on the PS3 than it would be on the Xbox 360. Soon after we brought you Capcom's official response, to the inevitable criticism expressed on forums across the web. It said: "We don't set the prices of our games, that's at the discretion of the retailer. In this specific instance, the process has resulted in a price difference, but the process itself is not something we completely control."

The comment effectively laid the blame squarely at the foot of the retailers. has asked a number of retailers, including Play and GAME, for comment, with no success so far. Silence can speak volumes in certain situations. Many gamers view a "decline to comment" as an admission of guilt. Whatever the truth, gamers shouldn't and don't care about the reason why. All they know is that it's not right. With a game like DMC4, which, irrespective of what you read, is nigh on identical across both platforms (check out our DMC4 video comparison to make your own mind up), why should it be more expensive on PS3? I can't think of one good reason.

The DMC4 pricing story received lots of interest, mainly because it involved a high profile game and because of the massive, £10 price difference. But is it a new phenomenon? Do PS3 owners regularly pay over the odds?

I thought I'd do a little research and check out the RRP (recommended retail price) of a number of games available for both the PS3 and the Xbox 360 to see if the DMC4 case is a special one or just the latest case where PS3 owners have got a bum deal. Here's my findings (RRP gathered from

Devil May Cry 4 - 360 £39.99 PS3 £49.99

Burnout Paradise - 360 £49.99 PS3 £49.99

Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare - 360 £49.99 PS3 £49.99

The Club - 360 £44.99 PS3 £49.99

Turok - 360 £49.99 PS3 £49.99

The Orange Box - 360 £49.99 PS3 £49.99

Kane & Lynch Dead Men - 360 £44.99 PS3 £49.99

Need For Speed Pro Street - 360 £49.99 PS3 £49.99

Tony Hawk's Proving Ground - 360 £44.99 PS3 £49.99

Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter 2 - 360 £49.99 PS3 £49.99

Skate - 360 £44.99 PS3 £49.99

WWE SmackDown! vs. RAW 2008 360 £44.99 PS3 £49.99

Pro Evolution Soccer 2008 360 £49.99 PS3 £49.99

FIFA 08 360 - £49.99 PS3 £49.99

Conflict: Denied Ops - 360 £44.99 PS3 £49.99

I've highlighted in bold the games which are more expensive on the PS3. Seven out of what I consider to be the top 15 multiplatform games released in the last six months are more expensive on the PS3. There are no games here that are more expensive on the Xbox 360. This is not simply me being selective. I couldn't find any games that are more expensive on the Xbox 360 than they are on the PS3.

What conclusion should we derive from these (admittedly not comprehensive) findings? That PS3 owners have been and are routinely ripped off? Unfortunately I can't see any other conclusion.

Some will point towards the PS3 as a more powerful console - which, with the power of Blu-ray, provides bigger and better looking games. I'm not so sure PS3 owners get better versions of multiplatform games. While comparison videos are popular among gamers on the Internet, most only reveal how little difference there is between both versions. For all intents and purposes, games from the last six or so months are the same on PS3 and Xbox 360, with only the most picky and technically knowledgeable able to spot graphical differences - and these differences are usually in the Xbox 360's favour.

So why should PS3 owners be forced to fork out more? They shouldn't of course. I'm not going to get into the reasons why PS3 RRP can be higher than Xbox 360 RRP - that's a question I'll answer at a later date. For now, we have at least shown that PS3 owners sometimes do pay more for their games. And that is neither cool, nor right. So wherever the blame lies, here's my Monday Morning Rant: unless the PS3 version of a multiplatform offers significantly more content than the Xbox 360 version, keep the price the same.

Do you agree? Are PS3 owners being ripped-off? Let us know in the comments section below.

New stuff to check out


To add your comment, please login or register

User Comments

Anonymous's Avatar
Delete Post


In the US, all these multiplatform games cost the same. So there really is no excuse why they should cost more elsewhere.
Posted 22:03 on 11 February 2008
nothing new's Avatar
Delete Post

nothing new

Look in other territories and you will see that the popularity of a game console dictates game pricing.
Posted 21:36 on 11 February 2008
Enonymous's Avatar
Delete Post


I am absolutely disgusted by the way I have been treated as a PS3 owner. Not only are the games more expensive, but the backwards compatability is absolutely RUBBISH!

I spent four hours trying to get Speedball 2 to work yesterday, but the discs won't fit properly. Amiga better sort their act out, or I'm going to sell my machine and get a Spectrum 360 instead!
Posted 14:43 on 11 February 2008
DevilMan's Avatar
Delete Post


Yes Sony is getting ya $$ one way or another + for this game you Ps3 users have to spend 20+min installing on ya Ps3 harddrive. While us 360 gamers done beat the 1st level haha and payed less $$ for the same exact game LMAO.
Posted 12:16 on 11 February 2008
chris's Avatar
Delete Post


Here come the fan boys :)

@mike There is nothing wrong with the PS3 or Xbox and I bet you have never had a xbox, because the sony fan boys are not having a good time they keep bring up the RROD. they think people listen to them. The only reason it keeps coming up is because they have no games and that is why you but a "Games Console". So grow up and just enjoy your PS3...
Posted 11:50 on 11 February 2008
mikejosh1978's Avatar


i have always said for the last 6-8 mths that xbox must bung retailers some money to drop the price of their games to make them sell faster to make the xbox seem more popular cus it shifts more units a month in terms of games.i just traded my 360 in as it was my third after it bricked twice.ps3 ive had for 6 mths and bin on constantly with the kids and folding home and still going strong .just another case of microsoft trying to look better than sony like they did with vista and forcing consumers to buy their software fo 18 mths.hail the ps3 and we will fight the good fight to destroy the heart of mr gates and his poor console
Posted 11:15 on 11 February 2008
Gordo01's Avatar
Delete Post


Is it maybe because the ps3 is harder to develop for and longer to make games more labour etc, and that blu-ray is more costly. Could be the reasons why. Retailers costs are higher for ps3 games therefore the rrp needs to be higher. ?????
Posted 11:11 on 11 February 2008
Chris's Avatar
Delete Post


I think there is a good reason, the cost of producing the game on Blu-ray compared to DVD, I was told that if the game is the same then the 360 users are contributing to the cost of the PS3 version, which is not right.. Sony will take a bigger chuck for using Blu-ray then Philips for DVD.
Posted 11:10 on 11 February 2008
Mulac's Avatar


Your right, again. It doesn't make sense why its more expensive. It's good you brought this to light, I wouldn't have noticed it.
Posted 10:34 on 11 February 2008

Game Stats

Technical Specs
Release Date: 15/07/2005
Developer: Capcom
Publisher: Capcom
Genre: Survival Horror
No. Players: One
Rating: BBFC 18
Site Rank: 11,450 142
View Full Site