The visual makeover is good, but characters don't appear to be as attractive.
The visual makeover is good, but characters don't appear to be as attractive.

The visual makeover is good, but characters don't appear to be as attractive.

Slightly more successful are the changes to the personality system. Character traits replace the Zodiac signs used in previous versions of The Sims to determine the personality of your characters. Adult Sims may have up to five separate traits which can be chosen from a list of over sixty. Certain traits are mutually exclusive (such as the Good and Evil traits), while others form natural combinations. Evil, Genius, Insane and Kleptomaniac are especially good if you want to attempt to go for the Emperor of Evil life aspiration, for example. Traits also allow your Sims to perform personality-specific actions. Sims with the Inappropriate trait will always be able to insult or kiss other Sims, regardless of how well they know them, while Sims with the Flirty trait gives access to romantic interaction options with other Sims far earlier than normal, and Insane Sims may choose to go to bed in their swimsuit and go swimming in their underwear. With thousands of potential trait combinations, the personality system is intended to provide far more replay value than the star signs you were able to choose in the previous two Sims games. In practicality, however, the way certain traits allow some interactions (such as kissing or flirting) to be permanently available, regardless of relationship level, actually feels less rewarding than having to work for them. It’s arguable that this might make the game more accessible, but in the long term, making two Sims fall in love and get married because they spent time courting and getting to know each other feels more satisfying than being able to do the same in a much shorter time because one Sim had the Hopeless Romantic trait and the other was a Great Kisser.

The character traits you choose for your Sim will determine their lifetime aspiration, which is tied to a certain career path. The careers themselves remain mostly unchanged, though there have been several welcome changes. You are now able to choose how hard your Sim works at their job, and now the job opportunities take the form of tasks, rather than 50-50 questions that were just as likely as to get you demoted or fired as they were to help you earn your next promotion. Jobs now also pay on an hourly basis, rather than per day, which means that you can earn extra cash by doing overtime, if the opportunity arises. Promotions are still dependent upon your Sim’s skills and their mood, but the number of family friends is no longer a factor in how high you can climb up the career ladder. For some people this will be a great relief, having only to cosy up to the boss and your co-workers (which can be done while you’re at work, by selecting the appropriate work action underneath the action queue while your Sim is doing their job), rather than try to maintain friendships with a dozen Sims or more to reach the highest tier of the career path. The counter-argument, of course, is that this change makes the game too easy. The whole point of originally linking career progression to the number of family friends was that it would encourage the player to socialise with the community-at-large and have children to broaden the family’s social circle. By removing this link, you can make your Sims reach the peak of their chosen career without even entering a single non-work relationship. So while The Sims and The Sims 2 was structured in a way that encouraged family life across all the generations, The Sims 3 allows your characters to be friendless, individualistic people who only live for their jobs; which is certainly realistic compared to what happens in modern society, but not exactly terrific fun to play.

When it comes to the actual day-to-day, hour-to-hour management of the members of your household, again there have been changes. The AI of the Sims has been improved and the decay rates of the mood stats (Hunger, Bladder, Energy, etc) have been toned down to make them less reliant on micromanagement by the player and the icons in the action queue now show tooltips to let you monitor how long an action will take to complete. The Wants and Fears system employed by The Sims 2 has been replaced with a simplified version that tracks the wishes of your Sim, which may be as simple as wanting to have waffles for breakfast or as life-changing as wanting to have a baby. Fulfilling these wishes gives your Sim reward points that can be redeemed for personality modifiers or reward objects. Again, these rewards are a bit of a mixed bunch. Some of the personality modifiers, such as the Steel Bladder attribute, are virtually essential, but the reward objects, like the Collection Helper (a device shows collectable items on the town map), are luxuries at best and superfluous at worst. Most worrying, however, is that the rewards have lost their sense of fun. What’s happened to the Eclectic And Enigmatic Energiser, the SimVac and the Love Tub?

You're now able to move about the town without any loading

You're now able to move about the town without any loading

The Sims 2 was the video game equivalent of Sunset Beach: A soap opera chock-full with beautiful people, small, shonky sets and more overwrought melodrama than you could shake a stick at. It reflected aspects of real life with its revolutionary level of interaction and the beautiful intricacy of its animation, but it never took itself too seriously along the way. The Sims 3, by comparison, is more like Eastenders – and not just in the ugliness of its cast. The pervading sense of playfulness from its predecessors has been lost in the nuances of the character animation and the way you interact with the game world hasn’t really changed. In essence, it feels much more like Sims 2.5 than Sims 3. It’s missing the vital spark of innovation that made the first two games so special. Instead, it takes The Sims 2 and broadens the canvas and makes a few interface tweaks. The only dramatic step forward is having the town fully rendered on a single map, but that doesn’t actually change the way you play the game that much. The game smacks of EA’s traditional, safe development strategy: take what people like and make it shinier. There’s a distinct lack of ambition and a worrying lack of content. The Sims 2 shipped with three separate towns. Out of the box, The Sims 3 only has one. Hairstyles and clothes that were available in the base game of Sims 2 are curiously missing from its successor. Which brings us neatly to the biggest thing about The Sims 3 that will have the alarm bells of cynics worldwide clattering loudly: In a single, horrible, compound word: micro-transactions.

Registering your game with EA’s Sims Store will allow you to download a second town for free and also grant your account 1000 Sims Points (worth $10), which you can use to purchase new clothes, hairstyles or household objects. There are distinct shades of Horse Armour Syndrome here, but the key to whether this is a cynical cash-grab on the behalf of EA or a worthwhile method of rolling out new content into the game depends on whether the content available via the Store will be packaged along with the inevitable expansion packs or not. If the content on the Sims Store stays exclusive to the store and is not simply added alongside any mechanical tweaks introduced by the expansion packs, then perhaps investing the extra money in those Sims Points is worthwhile. If, however, the store items are all included in any future expansion packs, there’s a danger that people will end up paying twice for the same content, and this will be unacceptable in the eyes of many gamers. It also seems like cheek on the part of EA that they produced these items during the course of the game’s development, but would rather you paid extra for them, rather than include them in the game. Requiring you to register your game with the Sims Store to get access to the second town is done purely in the hope that you will then go on to spend money in the store, as there’s no reason why it couldn’t have shipped on the disk with the rest of the game. Of course, it’s difficult to predict how EA will choose to implement content on the store with respect to what they include in any future expansions, but if the way they’ve handled the release of the game is anything to go by, the initial signs aren’t particularly promising.

It would be overly harsh to say that The Sims 3 is on the express train to Crapsville. It’s still very much a Sims game, with everything that implies. A lot of your enjoyment with the game will still be determined by the amount of imagination you bring to the game yourself, but there’s a definite sensation that the interactions and animations within the game feel much more humdrum and ordinary this time around. It’s only the inclusion of a much slicker set of tools to allow the recording of machinima movies and the sharing of customised content that prevents an even harsher score. While there was a significant step up both technically and in gameplay terms between The Sims and The Sims 2, the same can’t be said of The Sims 3 compared to its predecessor. There’s nothing in The Sims 3 that would persuade someone who didn’t like the previous games to enjoy this version. Likewise, if you’ve played The Sims 2 and its expansions to death, The Sims 3 will feel perilously like a retread of old ground, albeit on a slightly grander scale. The core of the game is still strong, but by not showing the same level of ambition as the previous two titles at the design stage, The Sims 3 feels slightly stunted by comparison. It remains at the top of the genre almost by default, given that the few Sims-clones released to date are all so toe-curlingly awful, but in avoiding the trip to Crapsville, instead it’s taken the stopping service from Decentburg to Averagetown. Whether EA can return the franchise to the rails leading back to Awesomeopolis with future expansion packs remains to be seen…

New stuff to check out

3 Comments

To add your comment, please login or register

Highest Rated Comment

renegade's Avatar

renegade

WoW some one did not like this game much :P
Posted 12:33 on 19 June 2009

User Comments

Stratix's Avatar

Stratix

Wow, this review has taken a trip to Crudstown.

I would much rather play Sims 3 than the base Sims 2, the reviewer talks about most of the new features (apart from moodlets, an incredibly important part of the game) which are all very fun and interesting, yet doesn't seem to think they add much to the game. They do.

I don't know what his problem is making attractive Sims, I have no trouble making attractive females and/or males for that matter.

Also, the reviewer complains that Sims 3 has only one town out of the box, and yet then goes on to say that there is another free one to download on the store. I understand that is still one "out of the box" but still, that's two towns to play with for anyone who hasn't downloaded a pirate copy of the game. I'm quite happy with two towns for now, thank you very much. I do agree on one point however, microtransactions suck.

I have never found zooming from one Sim to another a huge problem, it only takes a second or two on my rig and they are smart enough not to need caring for every second of the day. I don't have to keep telling my Sim's to go to the toilet and to go to bed before they pass out which makes large families easier to control, not harder.

A minor point, but the collection helper is actually very useful if your Sim is a gardener and needs to find special seeds, if reviewer knew this he would obviously not have complained about it. How about trying the game properly before you complain about it?

The job system is much better this time around, I can't believe the reviewer liked the system of maintaining dozens of friends to get promotions on Sims 2, it was irritating and pointless. The granny round the corner will not help me become an astronaut, so why do I need her to be my friend? The grounds for promotion are much more intelligent now, and the game encourages the player to socialise by letting him go to other peoples houses and walk around town, instead of forcing them to make friends just to move up in their job.

I understand this is not a perfect game, it does have its flaws, but it certainly does not deserve a 7. I do understand that this game has shipped with a lot less items and clothes than the base Sims 2, but there is still a lot more to do in number 3.

I wouldn't call myself a die hard fan of Sims, but I certainly don't think that this review does the game justice. Then again, having a lowest score of a decent game on metacritic may buy this website some easy traffic.
Posted 16:31 on 26 July 2009
BalooMoo's Avatar

BalooMoo

I honestly couldnt agree with you more, die hard Sims 2 fan and was so excited about the Sims 3, played it and got bored pretty much right away. Although the customisation is amazing after I create my families I then cant be bothered playing it! Slightly confused what the creaters were thinking with this game, the graphics (especially camera angles) rival the Sims 1 and the gameplay seems like a slightly more confusing yet lazy version of the Sims 2! How is it possible to get to the top of career without taking up all the sims time, unlike Sims 2 where if there happy, clever and popular they're sorted!
Until they start cranking out the expansion packs I think ill stay clear...
Posted 21:46 on 17 July 2009
renegade's Avatar

renegade

WoW some one did not like this game much :P
Posted 12:33 on 19 June 2009

Game Stats

The Sims 3
7
Out of 10
The Sims 3
  • High level of customisation
  • Improved Sim AI
  • Lacks novelty and spark
  • Large households are difficult to manage
Agree? Disagree? Get Involved!
Release Date: 06/06/2009
Platforms: PC , Xbox 360 , PS3 , 3DS , iPhone , Wii , DS
Developer: Maxis
Publisher: Electronic Arts
Genre: Simulation
Rating: PEGI 12+
Site Rank: 1,091 172
View Full Site