Neverwinter Nights 2 Review for PC

On: PC Xbox 360  Check Price
Drow Elves are just one of the new playable races
Drow Elves are just one of the new playable races

Drow Elves are just one of the new playable races

It has been observed that I am, quite possibly, the most impatient man in the entire universe. If some poor hapless driver in front of me at a set of traffic lights takes five seconds too long to drop the clutch, such abuse will stream from my mouth that even on a rain-sodden, foggy day the air will turn decidedly blue. And pray that you never take a small trolley through a "basket only" queue in a supermarket in my presence. There is no defence against the torrent of bile that will be unleashed against you, and old age, infirmity or only having five items is not a sufficient excuse. So you can imagine my consternation while playing an RPG such as Neverwinter Nights 2, when it dares to make me wait over half a dozen hours before something really interesting happens.

Think about it: eight or ten hours is a longer time investment than you'd put into a lot of first-person shooters. Yet because Neverwinter Nights 2 is an RPG, and because RPG players expect a campaign game of forty hours or more, somehow making you wait a quarter of that time for things to really get interesting is somehow considered (by developers) to be acceptable. Well, it's not. Though given Obsidian's track record - both in their current guise and their previous incarnation as Black Isle - perhaps it's not really a surprise that Neverwinter Nights 2 is a slow starter. Both KotOR 2 and Planescape: Torment took a good eight hours or so to build any real sense of intrigue and immersion. Here, though, there's a real risk that the player may simply lose patience and go off to play something else; and that would be unfortunate, because once the story takes off, it really starts to soar. As game crimes go, keeping the player waiting ages for the story to kick off isn't quite a capital offence, but it does smack of taking the expectations of your audience for granted, even if you are touting your game as an "action RPG" (i.e. where the story takes a back seat to the hacking and slashing).

The story (when it finally begins to tie together plot threads) is relatively straightforward, but nonetheless interesting for it. Your character is thrust (from a predictably humble origin) into the centre of a decades-old intrigue of magic, ambition, revenge and even extra-planar travel. The story revolves around silver shards - fragments of a Githyanki silver sword - shattered in a battle between a powerful wizard and the King of Shadows, long ago. After a mercifully short (and genuinely instructive) tutorial, the game starts with an all-out attack on your character's village by gray dwarves, bladelings and a Githyanki wizard, intent on retrieving one of these lost shards. Once you have helped successfully repel the attack, you are tasked by your tight-lipped (and equally uptight) foster father to travel to the city of Neverwinter for aid. Once reaching Neverwinter, you then proceed (in true adventurer-style) to stick your nose into every single nook and cranny, doing anything and everything from shaking down the local merchants in Neverwinter Docks to fighting orcs in the mountains. But it's only when the dastardly Luskans turn up (with a horde of demons in tow) that the story really starts building momentum.

'When the dastardly Luskans turn up (with a horde of demons in tow) the story really starts building momentum.'

In many ways, Neverwinter Nights 2 is a return to the traditional party-based RPG. While the prequel only allowed you to take on one henchman (and later a pair in the Hordes of the Underdark expansion), here you are allowed a maximum of three; plus animal companions, familiars and summoned creatures. Other (non-controllable) NPCs may join your party as well, so at times it can feel like you're leading an army, rather than a cosy cohort. Your fellow party members are all well fleshed out as characters and some may even take dislikes to others: the Paladin Casavir, for example, will not take to Bishop, an evil Ranger, and pretty much everyone will hate the Gnome Bard Grobnar, for reasons best left for you to find out for yourself.

Area effect spells like Fireball now have a natty runed cursor to allow you to target them with greatest effect

Area effect spells like Fireball now have a natty runed cursor to allow you to target them with greatest effect

Each NPC has their own sub-quest, which can either be pursued or ignored at your own discretion. Though as these quests will yield valuable experience and allow you to gain influence over your companions (much like the system first seen in Obsidian's KotOR 2), they're definitely worth completing. The only real problem with the NPCs is that there are simply too many of them. Depending upon the class you take for your main character, you will quickly find the best combination of NPCs for you to party with, whereupon the rest simply become superfluous; other than on the rare occasions where you must take a certain NPC in your party. The game also restricts your access to certain areas according to how far you have progressed with the main plot, meaning that you never really feel that you have the time or the freedom to wander off on a tangent and tie up the sub-plots before returning to the campaign's story thread (compared to a game like Baldur's Gate, say).

New stuff to check out

Comments

To add your comment, please login or register

User Comments

cristi_camatar's Avatar
Delete Post

cristi_camatar

i'm serios
Posted 16:48 on 07 September 2008
kelticpete's Avatar

kelticpete

I agree with your nwn2 review.

nwn2 feels like a game that should have happened before nwn 1. it is a step in the wrong direction.
Posted 01:49 on 15 January 2007
Mark's Avatar
Delete Post

Mark@ Moo

I'm generally not a huge fan of Pro-G's reviews, but I have to say that this is one of the best, well written and detailed reviews yet - and I whole heartily agree with the complaints, although I find the score a tad high.

I sadly find Obsidian incapable of making a decent action-RPG ever, and I'd only imagine that NWN2 would've been much better if it hadn't been rushed out the door, which is so damn obvious by some of the bugs that constantly pop up.

Nice review.
Posted 12:43 on 21 December 2006
Delta DayRaid's Avatar
Delete Post

Delta DayRaid@ Moo

This game deserves no more than a 5 in my estimation. It's virtually unplayble out of the box, and once you do get the 1.3 patch you're still left wondering why you needed a Geforce 7900 to see it all at decent settings.
It's much more linear than its powerful and intricate predecessor, and clamoring through the games ui is like pulling teeth. Multiplayer might be the biggest let down of all, since the inception of the pathfinding (pwc) limits your ability to explore and forces users to download files to play on each server they find. If I had it all to do over, I wouldn't have wasted 30 hours of my life I can never get back playing obsidian's excuse for a sequel, and back at the store would have reached for Guild Wars Nightfall or Medieval II instead.
Posted 15:49 on 09 December 2006
Iain_McC's Avatar

Iain_McC@ Moo

Ack. My bad... My fault for *looking* instead of *reading*. I've removed the offending section, as clearly it's a little unfair to criticise the game for *my* stupidity.

However, even taking that into account, I still have some severe reservations about the interface and the general standard of the code, so the score stays as it is.

Thanks for the feedback, though. Much appreciated.
Posted 13:07 on 01 December 2006
Thay's Avatar
Delete Post

Thay@ Moo

I wish to thank you for writing an even-handed review. It's a little more critical than I felt it might have been (considering the potential of the toolkit and some of the official and fan fixes already out there) but it was fair and intelligently considered and written.
Posted 08:58 on 01 December 2006
Anonymous's Avatar
Delete Post

Anonymous@ Moo

It's unfortunate that you wasted an entire paragraph bemoaning the loss of the "tab" functionality when this same function is there, just remapped to the "z" key. This fact is clearly identified in both the manual, key mapping section, and (most importantly) the beginning of the tutorial. However, gauging by your self-described impatience, it is not surprising you missed this notable fact. Unfortunately, these misteps in a review severely undermine the credibility of an otherwise fair and on-point critque.
Posted 01:19 on 01 December 2006
Anonymous's Avatar
Delete Post

Anonymous@ Moo

You use the z-key to highlight objects that you can interact with.
Posted 23:19 on 30 November 2006
Retro's Avatar
Delete Post

Retro@ Moo

I bought this game about a week ago, played it for 2 days and got fed up with it, theres alot of technical problems in the game, Multiplayer is hard to get into as many of the servers have some custom mod on.

PS. Dont blame the tech problems on my comp, its top spec
Posted 21:47 on 30 November 2006
Iain_McC's Avatar

Iain_McC@ Moo

This is what we call "splitting hairs"...

It explicitly says "Aurora Engine" on the splash screen at load-up, because the "Electron engine" is based on Aurora tech. Plus the SDK toolkit is also labelled "Aurora"...

And besides, none of that changes the fact that it looks ropy... :-p
Posted 19:35 on 30 November 2006
Moo's Avatar
Delete Post

Moo

NWN2 is -not- the Aurora engine. It's a totally rewritten engine, the "Electron" engine.
Posted 18:20 on 30 November 2006

Game Stats

System Requirements
7
Out of 10
Neverwinter Nights 2
  • Great characterisation
  • AD&D 3.5 without the dice
  • A buggy 3D engine starting to show its age
  • Slow to start
Agree? Disagree? Get Involved!
Release Date: 03/11/2006
Platforms: PC , Xbox 360
Developer: Obsidian Entertainment
Publisher: Atari
Genre: RPG
No. Players: One
Rating: PEGI 12+
Site Rank: 460 8
Check Price