SCEA Pres believes PlayStation appeals to all the demographics.

ps3slimpluscontroller -
ps3slimpluscontroller -

Sony Computer Entertainment America president and CEO Jack Tretton has told Forbes that while Microsoft and and Nintendo each have qualities, it is best for the industry as a whole that PlayStation comes out on top.

Asked what he thought of the competition, Tretton said of Microsoft: "I love their money. I think they can afford to be more patient, we're very profit driven, we're interested in a return on investment in a fairly short period of time. I think Microsoft's willing to go at it from a very steep curve in terms of profitability."

And of Nintendo, he commented: "Nintendo is almost the polar opposite. They know what they do well and they stick to it. They deliver a casual, youth-oriented entertainment experience that's very enjoyable after 20 years. And they make money, they print money. Their profitability is their key focus and features are nice but profitability is king and I think that is enviable."

He added that Sony sees itself "somewhere in the middle" of its two competitors.

"… we don't have unlimited money, we cater to a more mass market audience, and we are willing to take a little bit more risk than Nintendo is."

One thing is for certain; Tretton believes the industry as a whole will be better off with a PlayStation victory.

"We like to say that the environment where PlayStation wins is best for this industry, because we have a brand that can play on a worldwide basis, young and old, male and female, where our competition tends to be relegated to either select regions or to select consumer audiences."

Do you agree with Tretton? Is the industry best served by PlayStation coming out on top? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.

New stuff to check out

To add your comment, please login or register

User Comments

Woffls's Avatar

Woffls

When people are out of their depth, they hang on to whatever they can and don't let go :D People know little about video games, so they will stick with the Nintendo brand because that's what they're familiar with. It will take a long time for word of mouth to be effective for the new technologies, all the time Nintendo's traditional marketing will be overpowering because they have an absolute stranglehold on the expanded audience. It's not enough to show the consumer that your product is just as good or better, you have to convince them that it's worth the investment over what they already have.
Posted 12:18 on 07 October 2009
pblive's Avatar

pblive

I'm not convinced by the argument. Wii owners (the ones who don't want to play FPS games but want the occasional game of tennis etc) would need to buy a 360 and a Natal, or a PS3 and the wand and camera devices.

Some might want to fork out for this, but most will carry on using their Wii.

And, yes, the first batch of Wiis was sold by the Media advertising (whether this was in story form or otherwise) and then since then everybody talks about the 'family' ads from Nintendo with all the famous people playing.
Posted 10:33 on 07 October 2009
Karlius's Avatar

Karlius@ Mr_Ninjutsu

Wii has taken over though Ninjutsu! It's a fact. It has more sales than PS3 and 360 combined.

PB the Wii did not sell through advertising oh no it sold through word and mouth and the press. The press saw something innovative.
People thought wow I can play that it great fun. The first batch of people bought the console. And then the word and mouth aspect came in.
I for example went to a friends we had great fun. I thought I want one. Bought it only ever used it when people came over. Then they all bought one. No clever advertising was needed it sold itself.

The press has already made a big fuss about Natal it was on every news cast when announced at E3 it's already known about.
Now when I buy one you buy one and several hundred thousand others buy one and see how much more fun it is when your moving your whole body and the screen is picking it up on games such as ricochet or the painting game then even down to interacting via voice etc it will explode. (Sales wise not RROD or even YLOD style)
Microsoft and Sony alike will cater for all with this move to the motion market. It isn't primarily for it's existing customers that for cert. Its aim is to capture those customers that have been wooed by pastures new the casual gamer or the type of non serious gamer that bought the wii for the fun factor that 75% of people not talking about the die hard mario fans etc.
Posted 10:28 on 07 October 2009
El-Dev's Avatar

El-Dev

The more I've seen of Natal the less I want it.
Posted 23:19 on 06 October 2009
Mr_Ninjutsu's Avatar

Mr_Ninjutsu

I think MS are completely deluded to think Motion control is going to take over...what like now? No, don't think so Gates.
Posted 23:17 on 06 October 2009
pblive's Avatar

pblive@ Karlius

I'm not surprised, anyone who sees the Natal video will want one, that's what it's for.

What I mean is that the casual gamer (yes, them again) will judge what they need by the media and by others around them. Obviously you and I know a bit more and make more informative decisions as well as helping others but your average Wii owner won't probably hear that much about Natal or the PS3 wand and then they'll see the price it may turn them away.

I also think that Natal and the PS3 system will have a different sort of motion gaming more in line with their audience than the Wii.
Posted 23:10 on 06 October 2009
Woffls's Avatar

Woffls

Anyone that follows the industry closely enough knows what Sony's attitude has been since the PS3 launch run-up. Initially they were bursting with confidence, saying things like first five million would sell without any games. After seeing what Wii was offering, and how much attention it was getting, they considered it a threat. Upon doing so, they did what they've done several times before, and quite literally added motion sensing to the Dualshock so they could say "Hey, ours does this too". This was a direct response to Nintendo's move, and irrefutably so.

Eventually they realised it wasn't good enough; few games implemented it, even fewer did so with any real value. So they went about improving the technology and reimplementing it, which is fine, but at this point they change their marketing. Now PS3 does everything and they're all about the wider expanded audience, giving everybody what they want, and before you know it Jack Tretton is doing his research by watching Nintendo conferences from 2006.

Also, it doesn't matter how many new mascots you have when your current ones still get 90+ metacritic averages.

I was very close to not honouring this with a response because you chose to resort to personal remarks. Try not to do that next time.
Posted 23:06 on 06 October 2009
jakeistheman's Avatar

jakeistheman

woffls i don't really think i misinterpreted your posts, in my opinion you were being a raving Nintendo history grabbing fanboy. i don't dine that Nintendo are the fathers of gaming but i really don't think Nintendo has been great in the past 10 years the game cube and wii defiantly aren't high on my list of fav consoles and despite the controls they have made i'v seen a lack of new mascots/new characters from Nintendo.And in your previous posts i honestly feel like you think sony is a "i can do that to","ill do what you do but better " company while they have done this a lot before,how many new gaming mascots/new characters has sony/sony developers come up with in the last 10 years alot and most of them were great games. if you can change my mind about your previous posts im listening.
Posted 22:46 on 06 October 2009
K3RT's Avatar

K3RT

Lmao Rolo is some proper hardcore fanboy!

As for the actual article I agree with Pblive its just another PR stunt by Sony and we all now that Sony and Microsoft will carry on doing these little digs because there like little school kids on the playground.
Posted 09:35 on 06 October 2009
Karlius's Avatar

Karlius@ pblive

After showing my missus a tech video of Natal she went to work the next day and showed the staff there the video. All staff currently have a Wii. After the video all staff now wanted Natal. Whats more so did the kids that saw it (Missus works in a Nursery - No she isn't that sicko off of the Tele!). It's simple most casual gamers are fickle and don't give a sh*t of the brand just the experience they'll get out of it. It won't be too difficult to throw together a few Party style games that i'm sure already exist for natal such as bowling that will get the punters in.

I'm sure if I showed her the PS3 wand it would have a similar effect. However I don't believe it offers a whole new family experience as it's pretty much Wii 1.5.
Posted 09:32 on 06 October 2009
pblive's Avatar

pblive

The casual gamer will, in my opinion, still go with the Wii because Nintendo have been successful in selling their brand as THE brand to buy for these type of people.

Microsoft and Sony would both need to completely change their ads, the media perception of their console's user base and the general public to get more casual gamers on board.

The reason Sony was so successful with the PS1 was mostly down to their advertising and shaping media perception of their console, but now it's Nintendo that have learnt to use this trick to their advantage.

As to this article, it's just another PR ploy to remind people that the PS3 is out there, next week it will be Microsoft. Interestingly Nintendo don't get into this PR sniping, they don't need to.

At the end of the day, it's not down to who has the better hardware or even the better games but who controls the media and the spin.
Posted 09:06 on 06 October 2009
Karlius's Avatar

Karlius

This is PR bull*****Sony would say Sony deserve to win, Nintendo would say Nintendo and Microsoft would obviously say Microsoft.

Fact is Nintendo Is Winning, Microsoft lays in second place and at the moment Sony is last. Will it change maybe. The PS wand and Natal will make sure of that. The main kind of person purchasing wii have no allegance and if casual kinds of games become a better experience on these machines they'll make the switch. But I 100% believe we'll see a whole new or updated nintendo console by Christmas 2010 throwing a spanner in the works.
Posted 08:20 on 06 October 2009
cousinwalter's Avatar

cousinwalter

Nintendo created modern gaming as we know it along sega in the late 80s early 90s, but their innovations in recent times have appealed more to the dreaded causal gamer brigade and their reliance on mascots of old whereas in the lifespan of the PS2 sony heavily funded games like Ico and shadow of the colossus and now on the PS3 are supporting games like heavy rain. Don't get me wrong I think Nintendo are legends for what they've done but I think Sony have done more for the Games as Art debate in the recent past then any other company
Posted 08:11 on 06 October 2009
Mr_Ninjutsu's Avatar

Mr_Ninjutsu

This is turning into a History Battle.
Posted 07:44 on 06 October 2009
strickers66's Avatar

strickers66

Oh god,another deluded Nintendo man.The N64 had better games if you were a kid and happy to replay a game several times while you waited for another decent one.The problem is if you ask people for the best games you get the same 8 responses and then lots of thinking for any other good ones.The best of N64 may have competed with PS1 but you could play 10 times the amount of good games on PS1.Next you'll be coming out with my favourite"the cube had better games than PS2".That one is truly hilarious.
Posted 06:36 on 06 October 2009