About 12% of the population have 3D vision problems.

nintendo 3ds -

According to a study carried out by UK charity The Eyecare Trust, over six million Brits have poor binocular vision, meaning they have difficulty or cannot see 3D effects in games and movies.

"It's more than you think," Dharmesh Patel, chairman of The Eyecare Trust, told MCV. "About 12 per cent have 3D vision problems and you'll find a similar percentage worldwide.

"I don't think there are any long-term negative impacts. But it can create really bad headaches and aches behind the eyes. For these six million people it's like taking the 3D glasses off, making everything all blurry. You can't see the image and that causes headaches, eye-strain and blurred vision."

Patel added that there could be millions of consumers unaware of their vision problems.

"There will be people who have not attended an eye examination in years and are probably unaware they have a lazy eye or something like that.

"Some people won't even know why they can't see it. Sometimes something can be done, but it depends on the individual case."

3D was one of the buzz terms at E3 last month, with Sony pushing 3D games on its PS3 and Nintendo unveiling its 3DS handheld platform. Both technologies rely on our brain processing individual images from the left and right eyes to achieve a perception of depth.

New stuff to check out

Comments

To add your comment, please login or register

User Comments

rbevanx's Avatar

rbevanx

Anyway...

I don't mind not being able to use 3D, I'm quite happy enough with what is availiable at the mo.
The 3DS is the one that has me interested in 3D mind, I'll have to see if that gives me a headache like the current glasses though.
Posted 20:20 on 08 July 2010
Woffls's Avatar

Woffls

The irony is not lost on me. I have very little to care about as you can no doubt tell.
Posted 20:16 on 08 July 2010
Stegosaurus-Guy-II's Avatar

Stegosaurus-Guy-II@ Woffls

Sounds hypocritical.
Posted 20:14 on 08 July 2010
Woffls's Avatar

Woffls@ Stegosaurus-Guy-II

I think 'everyone' just wanted to point out they didn't care if you cared or not. Not that you are of course.
Posted 20:11 on 08 July 2010
Generic-Username's Avatar

Generic-Username@ Stegosaurus-Guy-II

Maybe he reported results about it because.. it's his job?
Posted 20:06 on 08 July 2010
Stegosaurus-Guy-II's Avatar

Stegosaurus-Guy-II@ Woffls

Geez, why's everyone being so pedantic about an 8 word sentance?

If some people won't be able to see 3D because they're too much of a nerd, it won't effect me. That's all I'm saying.
Posted 20:05 on 08 July 2010
Woffls's Avatar

Woffls

There's a difference between wanting to care and having to care. If Dharmesh was at your door with a broomstick and a copy of his research then you might have a point.
Posted 20:01 on 08 July 2010
Stegosaurus-Guy-II's Avatar

Stegosaurus-Guy-II@ Generic-Username

Dharmesh Patel obviously wanted people to care about people with poor eyesight or he wouldn't have reported results about it.
Posted 19:57 on 08 July 2010
Generic-Username's Avatar

Generic-Username@ Stegosaurus-Guy-II

Did anyone say you have to care?
Posted 18:18 on 08 July 2010
Stegosaurus-Guy-II's Avatar

Stegosaurus-Guy-II

Why should I care about other peoples problems?
Posted 15:58 on 08 July 2010
guyderman's Avatar

guyderman

There are plenty of people that have a disability that prevents them from using a bicycle or a skateboard - so should they stop making them!
Posted 14:29 on 08 July 2010
Woffls's Avatar

Woffls

This is stupid, it's like pointing out that 14% of the people in the UK can't read newspaper print. The article also avoids saying that this strictly means these people can't see 3D. They could probably see 3D with a few tweaks like having one part of the image stronger than the other to compensate. And if that's not good enough, well, you can't have everything and by the time 3D is good we'll all have magical telescopes in our eyes anyway.

It's also worth noting that most disability statistics are massively overestimated.
Posted 13:45 on 08 July 2010
Neon-Soldier32's Avatar

Neon-Soldier32

But surely this isn't as bigger deal as they're making it out to be. 100% of the population won't necesarrily use 3D. Also, not everyone's going to be buying 3D stuff any time time soon, due to price.

Many, say 50+ people probably won't want to use 3D.

So, if it's only 12% then it can't be that much of a big deal.

Finally, with the amount of 3D technology around at the minute, how long will it be before a 3D technology comes around that almost everyone can see.
Posted 13:33 on 08 July 2010